Ms. Dai Jinhua, a senior professor at Peking University and a film critic, recently made some public statements, claiming that the beautiful country is very closed in spirit and in the field of film. This statement has sparked some controversy. Ms. Dai has a rich academic background, having taught in the Department of Film Literature of Beijing Film Academy, and has taught at Peking University for many years. She has published a number of monographs in the field of film criticism, with a Douban score of more than 8 points, and some of her works have been translated and published in many languages.
However, even then, her views have been met with some criticism, with some questioning the accuracy of her claims and even accusing her of lying and not typing drafts when she made her opinions. Some people have become dissatisfied with her voice, finding her views and basis incomprehensible. Some people are puzzled by Ms. Dai's point of view, believing that the beautiful country is not closed, but shows its soft power and hard power to the world. Some have even questioned whether she has basic academic training as a scholar, as she does not have a clear definition of concepts before expressing her opinions.
In the field of film studies, there is an expert who has attracted much attention, and he is Dai. He once said that many theaters in the United States rarely show foreign movies, and American movies basically have no subtitles. This led him to the conclusion that the United States is "closed" to foreign films. However, is this assertion appropriate?Subtitles as a standard for whether a country is closed, what does this logic come from?In fact, Chinese movies have subtitles, and it is said that they are also related to ***'s questioning. In the past, Chinese movies did not have subtitles, in fact, movies in many countries around the world also did not have subtitles.
Therefore, it seems a bit illogical to use the existence of subtitles as a criterion for judging whether a country is closed or not. Some even think that such an assertion may be a manifestation of a closed mind. After all, whether the mental state of Americans is closed or not is not up to Mr. Dai to decide. The supplementary opinions of some netizens just prove the openness and tolerance of Americans. They pointed out that in the United States, films from various countries have always been screened, and there are even theaters, museums, non-governmental organizations, and special foreign film festivals that specialize in showing foreign films.
These facts may have been ignored or deliberately ignored by Mr. Dai. Of course, Mr. Dai, as a professor at a famous school, lives a very chic life in the era of traffic in the ** era. However, we have to say that as a professor, it is obviously irresponsible to forget the truth of how to keep your mouth shut when you were young, to distinguish between right and wrong, and to open your mouth in order to earn traffic. As one netizen said: "We are all 'nasty scholars', we go down, downstream, we can be with most people."
And the 1% above are getting stronger and stronger, and more and more possessing the world's wealth, when we are the remaining 99%, with such people, with them to see the world, movies, culture, and society, I will be more at ease, happier, and more down-to-earth. I think it's fun to be alive. For Professor Dai, he has always been a titan in the field of film.
However, in a recent interview with another film scholar, Mao Jian, Professor Dai once expressed a concern about himself, fearing that he would become a "nasty scholar". This point of view has attracted people's attention, and one cannot help but wonder if an outstanding scholar will go down the road of "obscenity" for some reasonWhat kind of story is hidden behind this question?Let's take a look.