Recently, the Self-Management Committee of the School of Economics and Management of Jiangsu Suqian University issued a notice saying that from February 5, it will use law enforcement recorders to conduct dormitory inspections to monitor hygiene, prohibition and night non-return. This policy sparked fierce opposition from students. The students believe that this lack of consideration for their privacy is a complete violation of their rights. Dormitories are students' private spaces and should be protected, and bringing body cameras into dorms will only exacerbate intrusions into privacy and personal space.
The college gave two explanations for the students' objections. First of all, they said that this was done to solve the problem of student property safekeeping. When the student cadres inspected the dormitory, the students came back from class and found that their personal belongings were missing, and it was suspected that the student cadres had stolen them. However, not every student leader wears a law enforcement camera, and their suspicion cannot be completely ruled out. Secondly, the College believes that the use of law enforcement cameras can ensure that the handling and punishment of students by the Self-Management Committee can be implemented, so that students can be convinced.
However, these explanations did not dispel the students' concerns. Protecting personal privacy is more important than solving the problem of students' property, and this problem can be solved in a more scientific and effective way. A school should prioritize the protection of students' privacy and human dignity, rather than trampling on and destroying it. This kind of behavior will only cause students to lose trust and credibility in the school.
In the face of the opposition of the students, the college responded: "This regulation has not been implemented yet, and the opinions of the students are being sought." If the controversy is too large, it should not be enforced later. However, this change of practice will only further undermine the credibility of the college, and students will have doubts about the credibility of the college's decisions.
The dormitory is a private space for students, a place for students to unleash their natural instincts and be uninhibited. Here, the living conditions of the students should be completely protected. In contrast, there are surveillance cameras everywhere in the school, and the dormitory is a blank space without surveillance. This is because the school realizes that the dormitories are the private domain of the students and should be protected for privacy.
However, the self-management committee brought the law enforcement cameras into the dormitories, completely ignoring the students' right to privacy. No matter how much privacy a student has, it is not acceptable to record it one by one. Although SME's regulations clearly state that no one has the right to view the data content of the body camera, to ensure that the privacy of each student is not violated. However, the regulations are only regulations, how to ensure that the data is not leaked?Wouldn't it be better to keep the body camera out of the dorm room without absolute security?This is one of the reasons for the backlash from the students.
In the dormitory, students should enjoy a certain amount of freedom and privacy, which is an important space for them to relax and unwind. If this space is invaded by a body camera, students will not be able to truly feel the warmth and safety of the dormitory. If we were all in the line of sight, how much real privacy could there be?The opposition of the students is precisely the strong rejection and ** of this invasion of privacy.
The college believes that the use of law enforcement recorders can solve the problem of student property custody and the implementation of the work of the self-management committee. However, these problems can be solved in a more scientific and effective way, rather than violating students' privacy.
First of all, dealing with the problem of loss of students' property can be solved by strengthening dormitory safety management and strengthening awareness education. Schools can step up security patrols and install security facilities, and students should take care of their belongings. In addition, it is also an effective way to guide students to manage their property correctly through education and improve their safety awareness and autonomy.
Second, the self-management committee can establish a system for dealing with and disciplining students.
1. Standardize the system and improve relevant procedures and policies to solve the problem. Schools can have clear rules and processes in place to give students a full understanding and satisfaction with the results. At the same time, student cadres should also strictly abide by the regulations, set an example, and protect the rights and interests of students.
In short, in response to students' opposition to the entry of law enforcement cameras into the dormitory, schools should pay attention to students' privacy and personal space to protect students' personal dignity. A more reasonable approach can be adopted to solve the problem of student property custody and the implementation of the work of the self-management committee, rather than at the cost of violating student privacy.
When dealing with educational management issues, it is essential to protect students' privacy and personal space. Student dormitories are their private domain and should be respected and protected. Bringing a body camera into the dormitory is undoubtedly an invasion of student privacy, and this practice should not be supported and enforced. Solving the problem of the custody of students' property and the implementation of the work of the self-management committee can be solved in a more scientific and effective way, rather than at the expense of student privacy. Schools should value students' voices and protect students' rights and interests in order to build a safe and trusting Xi environment that respects individual privacy.