The feasibility of land for retirement**, what do you choose?
Introduction: With the gradual aging of rural society, the problem of farmers' pension has become the focus of public attention. Compared with urban residents, the old-age security system of farmers is relatively weak, and there is a lack of solid old-age system support. This has led to people's thinking about how to use rural land to solve the problem of farmers' pension. On the one hand, some people propose to obtain high compensation or help pay the pension insurance for landless peasants through paid withdrawal or transfer of landOn the other hand, some people believe that farmers can use the land in their hands to become self-sufficient and obtain income through leasing, transferring, equity participation and cooperation, etc., so as to solve the problem of old-age care. Behind this, we have to ask ourselves, whether this method is feasible, and whether it can really solve the problem of farmers' pension
Mainly in the form of withdrawal or transfer of land.
In recent years, some areas have begun to explore ways to solve the problem of farmers' pension through paid pension and land transfer. In this way, farmers who are particularly in difficulty can be provided with high compensation, and some even choose to quit their land, estates and houses in exchange for compensation, live in nursing homes, and receive monthly pensions, which to a certain extent improves the quality of life of farmers in their later years. The results of the pilot program showed:"Retirement with land"The way is feasible. However, it should be noted that there are generally specific conditions and restrictions for participating in this method, such as rural households without children and farmers who have settled in cities.
Expansion: Paid retention or land transfer is especially applicable to farmers who have no children or have settled in urban areas. Past practice has shown that paid land retention can provide farmers with substantial compensation, thereby helping them improve their lives in their later years. Some elderly people choose to use the income of the land retention to supplement their pensions, and choose to live in urban residences closer to the countryside to enjoy better services and living environment. In this way, they not only solve the problem of old-age care, but also enrich their life in their later years.
Rely on land transfer to solve the problem of old-age care.
However, in practice, there are certain difficulties in solving the problem of old-age care through land transfer. Rural land circulation requires signing contracts with farmers and paying rent, but usually the land circulation is low**, which is difficult to meet the needs of living for a year. In most rural areas, older households own less land and are not able to generate as much income from land circulation as those with more land. In addition, some elderly people may also face the problem of delayed payment of land transfer fees, resulting in their basic rights and interests not being protected. Therefore, it seems that it is not feasible to solve the problem of farmers' pension by land transfer.
Expansion: Although some rural households have certain land resources, in practice, farmers still face certain difficulties in solving the problem of pension by relying on land transfer. The income from land transfer in rural areas is generally low, which cannot meet the annual living needs of the elderly. At the same time, due to the limited land area, it is often difficult for elderly families to get more benefits from circulation. In addition, the problem of arrears of land transfer fees is also widespread in some places, resulting in the loss of farmers' pension rights. In view of the existence of these problems, the author believes that land transfer is not a feasible solution to the problem of old-age care.
Summary: As can be seen from the above discussion"Reservation or land transfer"with"Trusteeship land circulation"While feasible to a certain extent, it does not work for all farmers. Reserved land or land transfer for compensation"It may be more suitable for farmers who have no children or have settled in the city, and they can solve their pension problems through fixed compensation and pension insurance. On the other hand, land circulation faces many difficulties, such as low rents and arrears, which make it difficult to protect the pension rights and interests of the elderly. Therefore, farmers must fully consider their personal economic situation and living needs and make reasonable choices. At the same time, middle-aged people should also take precautions, make plans for their later life, pay pension insurance, reduce the burden of their children, and protect the quality of life and rights and interests in their later years.
Conclusion: To sum up, as far as the way of rural land reform is concerned, it is feasible to use reserved land or land circulation under suitable conditions, but it must be selected according to the specific situation of each farmer. In contrast, it is difficult and not feasible to solve the pension problem through land transfer. Therefore, when farmers are faced with the problem of old-age care, they must make reasonable plans according to their own conditions and make appropriate choices within the scope of the policy. Only by fully considering the individual's economic situation and living needs and making a reasonable choice can we ensure that the quality of life and pension rights and interests of farmers are fully guaranteed.