Pseudo-originality checker, have you used it?
In the age of the internet, content creation is an important job, whether it is for publicity, education, entertainment, or other purposes, there needs to be high-quality original content to attract readers. However, some people will use some pseudo-originality checking tools to modify or confuse existing content to make it look new, so as to evade copyright or plagiarism responsibilities in order to save trouble or make profits. Such behavior is unfair and unethical for both content creators and readers.
So, what is a pseudo-originality checker?They are some software or ** that can modify articles automatically or semi-automatically, and their principle is to use some technical means, such as synonym substitution, sentence reorganization, grammatical transformation, addition or deletion of content, etc., to change the expression of the article, but not to change the main meaning of the article. In this way, the revised articles can be displayed as original or low-repetition articles through some simple plagiarism checking tools, such as Wenku, CNKI, etc., so as to achieve the purpose of camouflage.
What is the harm of a pseudo-original inspection tool?First of all, they harm the rights and interests of content creators because they steal or misappropriate the fruits of their labor without any respect or compensation. In this way, it will discourage the motivation and creativity of content creators, and it will also affect the quality and diversity of content. Second, they can mislead the reader because they make the reader think that they are seeing new or standalone content without knowing that they are ** or authentic. In this way, it will reduce the reader's judgment and criticism, and it will also affect the reader's learning and cognition. Finally, they can damage the ecology of the Internet because they cause redundancy and inefficiency in content, and also increase the spam and noise of the Internet. In this way, the resources and space of the Internet will be wasted, and the development and progress of the Internet will also be affected.
So, what should we do with pseudo-originality checkers?In my opinion, we should proceed from the following aspects:
The first is to improve one's awareness and ability of originality, whether as a content creator or reader, you should respect intellectual property rights, abide by copyright laws, do not use or disseminate pseudo-original content, and do not use or rely on pseudo-original inspection tools, but strive to create or read high-quality original content to improve your level and value.
The second is to improve their plagiarism checking capabilities and tools, whether as a content creator or a reader, you should use some more advanced and professional plagiarism checking tools, such as academic, Google Scholar, etc., to detect and verify the authenticity and originality of the content, do not be blinded by pseudo-original inspection tools, and do not let pseudo-original inspection tools deceive, but to stay sober and vigilant.
The third is to improve their critical and judgment, whether as a content creator or a reader, you should analyze and evaluate the content, do not blindly believe or accept the content, and do not easily ** or share the content, but have your own thinking and opinions, and have your own standards and principles.
Pseudo-originality checkers are an undesirable way of content creation, they will bring a lot of negative effects to content creators, readers and the Internet, we should resist and avoid them, but insist on and promote original content, so as to make content creation more meaningful and the Internet more valuable.