In the long course of history, the armies of the Ming and Ming dynasties have been highly controversial. Some readers insisted that the Ming army fought very well, but there were also many criticisms. Is it the Song Dynasty that is not good or the Ming army has a problem?Let's take a closer look at the Ming Dynasty's military's "pro-army policy" and its implications.
Zhu Yuanzhang's "pro-army policy" explores the secret: the army is closed and self-sufficient.
In a recent article, there was a criticism of the armies of the Song and Ming dynasties, accusing the Song army of not being good. However, the reader reminds the author that the Ming army did not always perform poorly, especially during the Hongwu and Yongle periods. However, the article points out that these glorious achievements may not stand up to scrutiny.
Zhu Yuanzhang's Northern Expedition and Results: What is Behind the Victory?
During the reign of Zhu Yuanzhang, he carried out 13 Northern Expeditions to the Northern Yuan Dynasty, and Zhu Di also carried out 5 personal expeditions to Saiwai, with grand scenes and rich results. However, did these brilliant results achieve the goal of eliminating the remnants of the Meng Yuan?The article argues that, in essence, the "victory" announced by the Ming Dynasty was often withdrawn after the people outside the city were killed and robbed.
The National Defense Situation of the Ming Dynasty: How Good Is It Compared to the Two Song Dynasties?
Compared with the two Song dynasties, the defense situation in the Ming Dynasty looked more favorable. However, the article suggests that the Ming Dynasty may still not have been as strong as it was against the Khitans and Dangxiang during the Song and Song dynasties. To some extent, the combat capabilities of the Ming army were even inferior to those of the Song army.
The problem behind Zhu Yuanzhang's "pro-army policy": the army is closed and self-sufficient.
The article points out that the "policy of supporting the army" implemented by Zhu Yuanzhang during his reign was actually to close off the army, isolate it from the common people, and form an independent system. This policy included the world military system and the self-sufficiency system, that is, the military household system of the Yuan Dynasty, which isolated the army from the common people's lives, and implemented tuntian in the army, so that the army was self-sufficient.
Zhu Yuanzhang's first army in the world: the real poor peasant emperor.
Zhu Yuanzhang is the only emperor who is really from a poor peasant, and he knows very well the suffering of the common people from the scourge of ** and the army. Therefore, he took a mean and ruthless approach to **, but he could not be as capricious to the army as he was to **. Zhu Yuanzhang's "policy of supporting the army" tried to prevent the army from disturbing and harming the people while maintaining the army's combat effectiveness.
Problems arising from Zhu Yuanzhang's "pro-army policy": the suffering of military households.
However, this policy has caused great problems for military households. Military households are required to farm and support themselves, but in reality they face the problem of insufficient land and excessive tax burdens. Military households were conscripted into the army, but it was difficult to make a living, and Zhu Yuanzhang tried to solve the problem through the "pro-army policy", but it led to more social contradictions.
The problem of the army under Zhu Yuanzhang's "pro-army policy": the decline in combat effectiveness.
The article pointed out that Zhu Yuanzhang's "pro-army policy" led to a large-scale expansion of the army, with a total strength of 2.8 million troops, which was unprecedented in Chinese history at that time. However, the number of people in the army who were actually used to fight the war was not large, resulting in a shortage of troops throughout the country. Zhu Yuanzhang's military decisions put the Ming Dynasty's finances in trouble, affecting the lives of the people and the stability of society.
The pitfalls in Zhu Yuanzhang's "pro-army policy": tax differences and the hardships of households.
The tax policy set by Zhu Yuanzhang was actually a kind of exploitation of military households, which made them bear heavier tax pressure. Compared with ordinary households, military households have a higher tax rate, which leads to social inequality. Under the "pro-army policy", military households are under tremendous pressure to make a living, and Zhu Yuanzhang's policy has not brought them substantial benefits.
The real problem of the army of the Ming Dynasty: the loss of combat effectiveness.
In the end, the article emphasizes that the real problem of the Ming army was not the combat effectiveness of the soldiers, but the loss of the army's combat effectiveness caused by Zhu Yuanzhang's policies. The army was forced to be closed and self-sufficient, which made it impossible for them to carry out combat missions effectively, which ultimately affected the fate of the Ming Dynasty.
Conclusion: Is Zhu Yuanzhang's "pro-army policy" wise or a disaster?
Was the combat effectiveness of the Ming Dynasty army caused by Zhu Yuanzhang's "pro-army policy" or was it caused by other reasons?This question is still worthy of our in-depth consideration over time. Did Zhu Yuanzhang's policy sacrifice the army's actual combat capability too much while protecting the people?This may be a mystery left to us by history, and we need to keep searching for the truth.
The Truth of the Ming Army: Zhu Yuanzhang's "Pro-Army Policy" and the Loss of Combat Effectiveness" profoundly reveals the internal problems of the Ming Dynasty army, especially the impact of Zhu Yuanzhang's "pro-army policy". Through the analysis of historical events, this article highlights the inadequacy of the Ming army's combat effectiveness, and calls on readers to think deeply about the profound impact of the policies of this period on the state and society.
First of all, the article pointed out that Zhu Yuanzhang's "policy of supporting the army" actually isolated the army from the common people, forming an independent system. This policy of closure and self-sufficiency has led to the inability of the army to effectively carry out combat missions, which has seriously affected its combat effectiveness. The article skillfully uses historical facts to reveal the impact of this policy on the entire military system, and makes readers think deeply about the political decisions of the time.
Secondly, through the analysis of the tax policy during the Zhu Yuanzhang period, this paper highlights the difficulties faced by military households under the "pro-army policy". This not only puts military households under heavier tax pressures, but also leads to social inequality. Through the revelation of tax differences, the author calls for social attention to the fairness of policies, so that readers can have a deeper understanding of the social class differences at that time.
At the same time, the article provides a profound analysis of the difference between the total number of troops during Zhu Yuanzhang's period and the number of people actually used in battle. Despite the large total number of troops, the actual number of troops used in combat is insufficient, resulting in a shortage of troops in various places and affecting the overall security of the country. Through this analysis, the article proposes a reflection on political decision-making and calls for the scientific management of the size of the army.
Finally, the article emphasizes that the real problem of the Ming Dynasty army was not the combat effectiveness of the soldiers, but the loss of the army's combat effectiveness caused by Zhu Yuanzhang's policies. This profound viewpoint arouses readers' attention to the truth of history, stimulates questions about the rationality of policies in the historical period, and enables readers to have a deeper understanding of the complex social and military situation at that time while thinking about history.
In general, this commentary** fully expresses concern about the policies and their impact during the Ming Dynasty while providing a comprehensive interpretation of the article "The Truth of the Ming Army". Through an in-depth analysis of historical events, readers are able to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the complexities of military decision-making during the Zhu Yuanzhang period, and the far-reaching impact it had on the country and society as a whole. This profound and insightful commentary** provides readers with deep historical reflections and provokes reflections on the rationality of policy.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!