RuralThe five-guarantee household system is used as a guarantee in our countryRuralA humanitarian system that has been put in place for the lives of the most vulnerable groups plays an important role in society. However, with the development and change of society, the five-guarantee household system is also facing some problems and challenges. This article will start withRural5. The subsidy standard and amount of the insured householdsFarmersThe proposal to abolish the five-guarantee household system is aimed at increasing everyone's understanding and thinking about this issue.
According to theRuralRegulations on the Work of Supporting the Five Guarantees".RuralThe standard of support for the five guarantees shall not be lower than the average living standard of local villagers, and shall be adjusted in a timely manner according to the improvement of the average living standard of local villagers. The specific standards and amounts shall be formulated and announced by the local authorities according to the actual situation. Therefore, the amount of money that can be received by the five guarantees households in different regions is also different each year.
In the specific investigation found thatRuralThe amount of money that a five-guarantee household can receive in a year is roughly between 7,800 yuan and 12,000 yuan, with an average of 650 yuan and 1,000 yuan per month. However, these are only basic living allowances and are not includedMedicalCoverage of other aspects such as expenses, housing allowance, nursing expenses and funeral expenses. In addition, ** and the society will also distribute some condolences and red envelopes to the five guarantee households during the New Year's festival to increase their joy of life.
Although the annual subsidy received by the five guarantee households has helped them maintain their basic living needs to a certain extent, it is still in modern timesMarket economyIn the context, is such a subsidy enough to ensure the quality of life of the five guarantee households?The living conditions of many households under the Five Guarantees are poor, with cramped housing, lack of basic living facilities, and a low quality of life. InMedicalDue to the poor health of the vast majority of the five guarantee households, it is requiredMedicalThe cost is also higher. Since the five guarantees are inEconomyon the difficulty, they can not afford the highMedicalExpenses. At the same time, due to the limited amount of living allowance, it is impossible to meet all the living needs of the five guarantee households, and there are still difficulties in daily transportation, clothing, food, housing and transportation.
SomeFarmersIt has been suggested that the five-guarantee household system should be abolished, believing that it does not meet the requirements of the times andRuralof the actual situation. Their recommendations are mainly as follows:
1. Unfair: manyFarmersIt is believed that there are unfairness in the five-guarantee household system. Only seniors over 60 years of age, who are unable to work or have no means of living can enjoy the best that ** offersSubsistence allowanceObstruct. However, many young people and the elderly who are able to work also face difficulties in life, but they are unable to enjoy the protection of the five guarantees. This makes them feel that they do not respect and value their labor and contributions enough, and it is also an infringement and damage to their rights and dignity. Therefore, they want to be able to build a more fair and reasonable oneSocial assistancesystem, so that all who need helpFarmerscan get the care and support they deserve.
Expand) although the establishment of the five-guarantee household system to a certain extent for the most difficultRuralResidents have helped, but will this help really solve their problems and get them out of their predicament?InRuralIn the region, many young people and elderly people who have the ability to work are also facing high living pressure, and there are also many difficulties to solve, but they do not meet the conditions of the five guarantee households. This prevents them from enjoying the same security and benefits, making it more difficult for them to escape poverty. Such differential treatment is not only unfair, but also prone to social dissatisfaction and instability. So, someFarmersIt is believed that a more fair and reasonable should be establishedSocial assistancesystem, let eachFarmerscan get the help and care they deserve, and jointly achieve social fairness and progress.
2. Waste of resources:FarmersIt is believed that the five-guarantee household system is wasted to a certain extentSocial resources。**It is necessary to provide living allowance for the five guarantee householdsMedicalGuarantees, such as costs, housing allowances, nursing expenses and funeral expenses, cost a lot of financial and material resources. However, these resources could have been used for other aspects of social development and improvement of people's livelihood, such as infrastructure construction, education and training, scientific and technological innovation, culture and entertainment, etc. Therefore, they believe that the five-guarantee household system is a waste and squandering of social wealth, and it is also an obstacle and drag on social progress. They want to be able to distribute and use it more rationallySocial resourcesand make more of itFarmersBenefit from social development and improvement of people's livelihood.
The five-guarantee household system needs to provide a large amount of financial and material resources to ensure the basic living needs of the five-guarantee households, but the investment of these resources cannot produce corresponding returns and benefits. Compared with the use of resources for other aspects of social development and improvement of people's livelihood, the five-guarantee household system is considered to be a waste and squandering of resources to a certain extent. SomeFarmersIt is believed that ** should be more rationally allocated and utilizedSocial resourcesand make more of itFarmersBenefit from the fruits of social development and promoteRuraloverall development.
3. Influence development: someFarmersIt is believed that the five-guarantee household system has affectedRuraldevelopment. Since the five guarantees can enjoy the minimum living security provided by **, they may lack the motivation and desire to work hard and create wealth, and are content to live a minimum life. This led to:RuralBrain drain andEconomybackwardness, also affectedRuralsocial stability and harmony. So, someFarmersIt is believed that the five-guarantee household system is forFarmersThe sense of self-reliance and self-relianceStart a businessThe spirit of innovation has played a weakened role, rightRuralhas adversely affected the development of development. They hope that they will be more valued and supportedRuraldevelopment, forFarmersCreate more opportunities and conditions so that they have the ability to realize their values and dreams.
Expand) five guarantee household system to giveFarmersA minimum subsistence guarantee is provided, however, for a long time, this security may also becomeFarmersLack of momentum for development. Because the five guarantees can rely on the guarantee of the first to live a basic life, they may lose the motivation and desire to work hard and create wealth. This led to:RuralBrain drain andEconomyThe lag in development is also not conducive toRuralStability and harmony in society. So, someFarmersIt is believed that the five-guarantee household system has been weakened to a certain extentFarmersThe sense of self-reliance and self-relianceStart a businessInnovative, rightRuralhas had an adverse effect. They want to be more focused and supportiveRuraldevelopment, forFarmersCreate more opportunities and conditions so that they have the ability to realize their dreams and values.
RuralAs a humanitarian system, the five-guarantee household system is the most difficultRuralResidents are provided with basic livelihood support. However, in the context of modern society, the five-guarantee household system also faces some problems and challenges. On the one hand, the amount of living allowance for the five guarantees households is limited, which cannot meet all their living needs, and the living conditions are poor. On the other hand, someFarmersIt is believed that the five-guarantee household system has problems such as unfairness, waste of resources and impact on development, and recommends that this system be abolished. In response to these problems and suggestions, we need to think and study more deeply, and find more reasonable and effective ways to protect themRuralThe most difficult groups of life are promotedRuralall-round development and progress.