Zhang Xuefeng, a master of postgraduate entrance examinations, said during the live broadcast, "Liberal arts is the service industry, and in popular terms, it is licking." The remarks sparked widespread concern and controversy. On the one hand, some people support Zhang's view that liberal arts graduates have a narrow employment scope and are mostly engaged in the service industry, and recognize Zhang's outspoken style. On the other hand, more people are indignant and dissatisfied with this statement, believing that its language is inappropriate and offensive to liberal arts students and service industry practitioners.
The incident has caused widespread heated discussions and controversy on the Internet. Some people expressed their support for Zhang Xuefeng on social **, believing that he spoke out about the practical dilemma of liberal arts employment, and praised his outspokenness. However, more people expressed indignation and dissatisfaction with Zhang Xuefeng's remarks, believing that his remarks were unnecessarily mean and discriminatory, and the disparagement of the service industry also sparked widespread discussion and debate.
The incident has raised memories of similar controversies in the past. In some past incidents, similar remarks have also aroused social attention and discussion. For example, a well-known blogger's remarks sparked a heated debate about liberal arts employment, while an actor's inappropriate remarks in an interview sparked controversy over specific industries. These events have led to a deeper reflection on freedom of expression and the responsibility of speech.
This incident has had a certain impact on society. First of all, this remark has aroused social attention and discussion about the service industry, and made the public begin to realize the importance and value of the service industry. Second, the remarks also sparked in-depth thinking and discussion on the issue of liberal arts employment and the relationship between liberal arts and the service industry. Finally, the remarks also raised the question of how public figures should be responsible for their speech, so that the public began to pay more attention to the influence and responsibility of speech.
According to the current understanding, Zhang Xuefeng has publicly apologized on social **, saying that his remarks were too radical and he is sorry for the controversy caused. However, this apology did not quell the controversy, on the contrary, sparked more controversy and criticism. There is no further update on the incident.
This incident has made the public more aware of the practical dilemma faced by liberal arts employment, and has sparked reflection and discussion on the responsibility of speech. On social media, there was a lively discussion and debate about the event. On the one hand, some people recognized his outspokenness and thought that he had told the truth about liberal arts employmentOn the other hand, more people expressed dissatisfaction and indignation at his remarks, believing that his remarks were mean and discriminatory, and the disparagement of the service industry also caused widespread controversy. The incident drew social attention to the service industry and raised questions about freedom of speech and responsibility, as well as more discussions about the influence and responsibility of public figures.
What do you think of Zhang Xuefeng's remarks?What do you think of the relationship between the liberal arts and the service industry?What are your expectations and requirements for what public figures say?Please share your thoughts and opinions in the comments section.