In the spring of 1953, in order to strengthen the party's leadership over the socialist transformation of agriculture, the organization 4700 million peasants, through mutual aid and cooperation, gradually transitioned to collective farms in order to socialize agriculture. The Ministry of Rural Work was established, and he served as the Minister to assist in promoting rural work.
**After taking office, we adhered to the principle of voluntariness, and put forward a clear path for the completion of agricultural socialization through three steps: agricultural production mutual aid groups, primary agricultural production cooperatives, and senior agricultural production cooperatives. However, with the advancement of national agricultural cooperatives, there was a change of thinking in the second half of 1953, believing that speeding up the speed of cooperativeization was a top priority.
On October 15, 1953, he stressed the need to speed up the pace of cooperativeization, arguing that if socialism did not occupy the rural front, capitalism would inevitably occupy it. Corresponding resolutions were promulgated, but in some areas there were "leftist" mistakes, such as forcing peasants to join the cooperatives and infringing on the interests of the middle peasants, which seriously dampened the peasants' enthusiasm for production.
** Pay attention to the problem, adhere to the principle of steady development, and believe that stabilizing the mood of the masses is a top priority. At the beginning of 1955, he reported the tense situation in the countryside to the city and put forward urgent instructions for consolidating cooperation, which was later simplified into the three-character scripture of "stopping, shrinking, and developing", which effectively alleviated the situation in the countryside.
In April 1955, after an inspection to the south, it was learned that the peasants had negative feelings towards socialism and demanded that agricultural cooperatives be accelerated. In many conversations with ***, ** put forward the goal of developing 1 million cooperatives, but *** insisted that half the doubling was enough. This caused dissatisfaction among ***, who called ***'s thinking "very stubborn".
On July 11, 1955, ** talked to *** again, asking for the continued acceleration of agricultural cooperativeization, and put forward the goal of 40% of agricultural cooperativeization in 1957. Insisting on one-third of the development rate caused *** to be angry, calling ***'s thinking "very stubborn", and saying that he wanted to use "cannon bombardment".
At the meeting of the provincial and municipal party committee secretaries, he was severely criticized for his "right-leaning mistakes", saying that he was as vacillating as a "woman with small feet". ** Had to be reviewed at the meeting.
Although he was wronged, he was always loyal to the party's cause. In the wave of agricultural cooperatives, he went deep into the rural areas to investigate and study, and adhered to his own principles. In January 1956, the country was primary, but the rapid pace of development left problems.
Although facing strong pressure, he believes that the figure of 300,000 societies cannot be ignored. After arguing with *** many times, ** stuck to his opinion. He was candid with *** in Zhongnanhai, and while he was criticized, he insisted that it wasn't just a matter of numbers.
**After much controversy, in 1957 the goal of 40% agricultural cooperativeization was finally achieved. ** Although he endured tremendous pressure in the process, his loyalty to the party's cause and adherence to principles made him still have a high position in the party.
The story teaches us that in driving social change, disagreements among leaders are inevitable. However, sticking to principles and being loyal to the cause of the Party are qualities that every Party member should possess. In the face of pressure and criticism, unwaveringly, for one's beliefs and ideas to the end, this is exactly the responsibility of a true Communist Party member.
In the process of agricultural cooperativeization, he showed his adherence to principles and loyalty to the party's cause, as well as his differences with him in promoting the speed of cooperativeization, all constitute a thought-provoking historical picture. This history not only reflects the divergent voices within the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) in the formulation and implementation of policies, but also highlights the steadfast conviction and deep responsibility of leaders to the people in the face of complex social change.
In the eyes of the people, the pace of promoting agricultural cooperation must be gradual and voluntary, so as to ensure the support and participation of the masses. This view reflects an understanding of the actual situation of rural society and respect for farmers. His insistence on the principle of not being in a hurry to achieve results and pursuing steady development was aimed at preventing problems caused by too rapid cooperation, including the decline in the enthusiasm of the masses.
However, the idea of ** changed in the second half of 1953, and he emphasized the acceleration of the pace of cooperativeization, believing that only by occupying the rural positions could the capitalist invasion be avoided. This shift may have been motivated by a new understanding of the situation at home and abroad, but it also gave rise to a series of problems, including the "leftist" mistakes in some areas, which led to the resentment of the peasants and the dampening of their enthusiasm for production.
Between ***'s insistence and ***'s demands, a heated debate arose. Not only did they insist that a third of the pace of development was more reasonable, but they also dared to speak up and express their opinions, which was not an easy task in the political environment of the time. His loyalty, integrity, and adherence to principles enabled him to maintain a lofty position within the party and demonstrate the responsibility of a Communist Party member.
This history sheds light on the pressures and divisions among leaders when it comes to driving social change. As the leader of the party, he has his own considerations for the urgency of agricultural cooperation, but he pays more attention to the actual situation and the feelings of the masses. In the process, the controversy between them became a piece of history and reflected the different views of the party on the implementation of the policy.
The principle of adherence to the principle has a positive effect on maintaining social stability and the stability of the enthusiasm of rural production. His actions demonstrated openness in the face of dissent within the party and adherence to the principle of democratic centralism. This historical lesson reminds us that respect for diverse voices and adequate discussion in policy formulation and implementation are essential for healthy development.
Overall, the performance of ** in this period of history shows the image of a party member who adheres to principles and works diligently and silently for the cause of the party and the people. His story is not only a part of history, but also an inspiration for contemporary Communist Party members, reminding us how to seek happiness for the people and contribute to the cause of the Party on the basis of upholding principles in the face of complex situations and diverse voices.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!