"In the short term" may only be about twenty years in human history, although this period may be a long time for individuals. The conclusion about the resurgence of world war is based primarily on the current stagnation of human productive forces. The peak of scientific and technological innovation has passed, and mankind has fallen into a bottleneck period.
Since the turn of the century, existing technologies have reached the limit in terms of application, and most of the so-called new technologies are based on traditional scientific concepts. Artificial intelligence, for example, has improved efficiency, but it has not led to real new knowledge or discoveries.
This increase in efficiency does not compensate for the social contradictions caused by the polarization of wealth distribution and the rapid growth of population. Humanity faces an insurmountable obstacle at the level of basic theory. In the divergence of wealth, some people indulge in a life of luxury and tightness, lacking motivation;While others are fixed in the lower middle class, unable to see the future, and living a simple and bland life.
In the face of this state of society, mankind urgently needs a deep war to overthrow the existing order and reconstruct the world pattern. This is not to advocate the barbarism of war, but to believe that war is a powerful catalyst for the progress of human science and technology.
The international situation has brought mankind to a critical moment again, and it is already difficult to make a breakthrough by climbing up. Every class lacks motivation, and the centuries-old human order has trapped humanity in a circle that cannot be broken without breaking it and taking two steps back.
Therefore, a world war will be a conflict between groups of people who are not satisfied with the status quo between the old and new order. As the old order is gradually catching up, the United States will inevitably resort to various means to repel the latecomers in order to hold on to its limited resources. This war is inevitable, if one of the parties is not defeated, there is no room for compromise, and all high-tech ** will be put into real combat.
In this war, it will not be the leaders of the two blocs who will die the most, but their client states. The purpose of war is to compete for resources, which means that the two blocs will initially compete for resources, which may be the Middle East or Africa, which are rich in resources and population, and these regions are bound to be the flashpoint of a world war. It also means that the people here will be the first victims of the war. Looking back at the early stages of World War I and World War II, it is possible to understand who was more tragic.
The final showdown will be the final and most tragic stage, and the winner is usually the side with the stronger cultural beliefs. In the end, this is not a call for war, but an acknowledgment of the fact that, just as everyone dies eventually, avoiding the word "death" does not prevent death.
The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any of the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.