The reform of the squadron system, streamlining and reorganization, aimed at improving efficiency. Looking back at history, in 1957, the armed forces merged the eight major headquarters into three general departments, and the five major branches of the armed forces were merged into the army, navy, and air force, and the number of arms was expanded to sixThen, 25 years later, the army was again reformed, targeting the three arms of artillery, armor and engineering.
This decision has been widely discussed and followed by a wide range of discussions. The organs of the three arms of artillery, armored troops, and engineering corps were downsized, downgraded, and merged into the General Staff Headquarters and became directly subordinate operational departments. This reform has sparked widespread discussion and heated discussions, and considerable efforts have been made by the leadership of the army. What will be the impact of this reform?What is the significance of this reform to the building and development of the armed forces?
What exactly is the purpose of the reform of the armed forces?Will the efficiency and combat capability of the army improve after the reform?This reform was carried out in 1982, when the military had a heavy workload and required specific and meticulous work.
It can be seen from the downsizing and downgrading of artillery, armor, and engineering units that the leadership of the army is very serious about reform. They have communicated and talked with the relevant departments many times, and strive to reduce conflicts and resistance as much as possible. How did the leaders make decisions on the reform of the armed forces?What factors did they consider in the decision-making process?
What difficulties and challenges have we encountered in the process of promoting reform?These are all issues of great concern. The implementation of the reform will have an impact on all branches of the army. For example, the railroad soldiers are also facing the reduction and transfer of the merger. During the discussions, cadres at and above the level of the railway corps reached a unanimous understanding.
They held that the tasks undertaken by the railway troops in wartime and peacetime should be preserved, and even if the number of personnel can be reduced, the organs and support detachments should be greatly reduced. What impact will the reform have on the job requirements and staffing of various military departments?
After the reform, the three major arms of the armed forces will be abolished, so after the abolition, how will the redundant cadres of the organs that originally belonged to these three branches of the armed forces be resettled?In accordance with the call for younger cadres put forward in 1982, how will the leaders of artillery, armored troops, and engineering troops be placed?And what does this mean for them?
How does the military leadership concretely implement the demand for younger cadres?In the process of reforming the armed forces, there is not only a review and summing up of the past, but also a prospect and plan for the future. This reform is of great significance to the building and development of the armed forces and to the enhancement of the army's effectiveness and combat capability.
It is hoped that the structural reform of the armed forces will better promote the modernization of the armed forces and enable the armed forces to better fulfill their mission of safeguarding national interests and security.