Biden launches a heavy air strike!Heavy casualties, US troops responded to the attack, what the hell happened?
In a serious conflict recently, the United States suddenly launched a heavy air strike on the Iraqi "Allah Brigade" and its related organizations, resulting in heavy casualties. This is not just a war, but also a confrontation, a storm that affects international relations. It makes me wonder what is going on in the world we live in
In a fierce air raid on December 26, the US military responded so quickly, with the ruthlessness and determination of the US military, which is jaw-dropping. Allegedly, the airstrike was in response to attacks by US troops in Iraq and Syria. At that time, I couldn't help but sigh at what kind of international relations this is, so that a country's decision-makers have chosen to use force so decisively. The Pentagon stressed that it was in retaliation for the attack on US troops in Iraq by the "Allah Brigade" and its related organizations. Is this a war of revenge, or is there a deeper reason behind it?
A drone attacked the international coalition military base at Erbil airport, the capital of Iraq's Kurdish autonomous region, wounding three US soldiers, one of whom was in critical condition. Biden immediately made a decision and immediately instructed the U.S. military to strike back. This can't help but remind me of similar incidents in the past, the counterattack after the attack of the US military, and the retaliatory actions again and again. And this time, they chose to get serious. As a result of the strike, more than 20 people were injured and one person was killed. Such a scale can't help but be shocking.
I found that since the outbreak of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict on October 9, more than 100 rocket or drone attacks have been carried out on US military bases in Iraq and Syria, injuring more than 60 US soldiers. What kind of vicious circle is this series of revenge and repetition?The U.S. military has repeatedly bombed anti-American militant groups in Iraq and Syria as a retaliatory action for the attacks, but has failed to prevent more retaliatory attacks. On the contrary, it seems to have stimulated a more violent revolt.
This has caused me to think deeply about international relations. Is the bombing of anti-American forces in Syria and Iraq a symbol or a real means of solving problems?In previous bombing campaigns, at most, several people were killed and injured, but this time, 25 people were killed and wounded. An operation of this scale is enough to show that the US military has really used force.
In a press release issued by the White House, it said forcefully, "If these attacks continue, the United States will choose the appropriate way to act in retaliation." This kind of hard-line attitude is obviously a means of making a statement to the outside world. However, the anti-American armed groups that bombed Iraq this time did not communicate with Iraq. It has been learned that Iraq** considers this to be a violation of Iraq's sovereignty and a hostile and unconstructive act. This can't help but make me wonder if the interference of big countries in international relations over small countries is really for the purpose of maintaining peace
In the midst of this international storm, Iraqi Prime Minister Al-Sudani's press service said that the United States attacked Iraqi military targets under the pretext of retaliatory measures, "which is clearly a hostile and unconstructive act" and that Washington's actions "damage" relations between the two countries and "seriously violate Iraq's sovereignty." This reminds me of whether this is a just war or an act of a hegemonic country that ignores the sovereignty of other countries
Throughout the incident, I saw the twists and turns and complexities in international relations. The United States has chosen to use force, but has it taken more factors into account in this decision?This incident has aroused heated discussions among netizens, and some people have expressed support for the tough attitude of the United States, believing that it is a powerful response to the bad behaviorSome people have questioned the US behavior, believing that it is a violation of Iraq's sovereignty and a violation of international law.
Overall, this incident made me think deeply about the complexity and variability in international relations. The game between big countries, the helplessness of small countries, every conflict is a tragedy of countless lives. At this time of change, we need to think rationally and call on the international community to resolve disputes through dialogue and consultation, rather than using extreme force. Only in this way can we create a more peaceful and stable world.