In U.S. support for Israel, the White House often says one thing and does another, with words and deeds inconsistent. The recent Hanukkah event once again demonstrated this. Macron's attendance at the Hanukkah ceremony sparked criticism at home that he had taken the opportunity to support Israel in disguise. And the United States ** Biden once again demonstrated his support for Israel by declaring himself a staunch "Zionist" on Hanukkah. However, a few days later, Biden's aides expressed criticism of Israel and said that the two sides were divided over the military conflict in the Gaza Strip. This kind of capricious statement is incomprehensible, because on the one hand, it shows the entanglement of US support for Israel with internal and external political interests, and on the other hand, it also reflects the unstable attitude of the United States towards the Middle East issue.
Hanukkah, as a traditional Jewish holiday, is of great significance in Israel. France's participation in the Hanukkah commemoration has drawn domestic criticism that he is supporting Israel in disguise. However, Polish parliamentarians took drastic action against the Hanukkah commemoration ceremony by extinguishing the candles with fire extinguishers. These events show a noticeable change in the attitude of Western countries towards Israel. Israel's international evaluation is gradually declining, and Western countries are not as strong in their support for it as they used to be.
Expanding: France** Macron's attendance at the Hanukkah commemoration is actually a sign of respect and care for the Jews. However, this move was interpreted by some in the country as his partiality towards Israel. On the important day of Hanukkah, Macron's presence also caused some controversy. On the one hand, many see France's support for Israel as a positive signal for Israel. On the other hand, Macron's motives have also been questioned, arguing that he is motivated by political interests to curry favor with the Jewish electorate. In any case, the actions of France ** have sparked a discussion about the position of Western countries on Israel.
Over the past few years, the attitude of Western countries towards Israel has changed from overwhelming support to non-support. This shift is related to the deterioration of the situation in the Middle East and the fact that the results of the efforts of Western countries over the past year or so have lost their effectiveness. Western countries have tried to persuade Israel to refrain from acting, but Israel has not listened. The United States did not achieve the desired results in a number of diplomatic visits, eventually publicly stating Israel's inhumane behavior in military operations and issuing harsh criticism of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. This is seen as a reduction in the attitude of the United States towards Israel.
Expand: Western countries' support for Israel is no longer as strong as it used to be. They expressed concern about Israel's practices in military operations and tried to influence Israel's decision-making through diplomatic channels. However, Israel has always stood its ground and is unwilling to bow down to foreign interference. This has led to a gradual decline in support for Israel in Western countries, and even the emergence of critical voices. This phenomenon reflects the confusion and helplessness of Western countries on the Middle East issue, and also reveals the contradictions and differences between Western countries and Israel.
U.S. ** Biden once again demonstrated his support for Israel by declaring himself a staunch "Zionist" on Hanukkah. However, a few days later, Biden's aides expressed criticism of Israel and said that the two sides were divided over the military conflict in the Gaza Strip. This kind of capricious statement is incomprehensible, because on the one hand, it shows the entanglement of US support for Israel with internal and external political interests, and on the other hand, it also reflects the unstable attitude of the United States towards the Middle East issue.
Expanding: United States ** Biden on the one hand expressed his support for Israel by saying that he is a staunch "Zionist". However, in the face of the conflict in the Gaza Strip, his aide has expressed criticism of Israel, noting that the two sides are at odds over the military conflict. On the one hand, this shift in statement may be due to the consideration of internal political interests in the United States, Biden needs to maintain his support in the Jewish consortium and fight for resources for next year's ***. On the other hand, it also reflects the lack of stability in the US strategy for dealing with the Middle East issue, which is likely to be influenced by external factors.
The United States has been inconsistent in its support for Israel, and the change in its rhetoric reflects its political interests. The attitude of Western countries towards Israel has also changed from pro-support to non-support. The complexity of the Middle East issue and the intertwining interests of all parties make it difficult for Western countries to agree in the face of Israel's actions. Israel's attitude and actions have also sparked questions and criticism from the international community. Against this backdrop of contention, a change in the U.S. stance will undoubtedly have a major impact on the situation in the Middle East. As for us personally, we should keep an eye on international affairs, understand the positions and interests of different countries, and find our own judgments and positions from them. Only with a comprehensive knowledge and understanding of the development of the world can we better participate in it and make our own contribution to the realization of a peaceful and stable international environment.