With the "attention" of the international community, * the pressure is increasing, and the United States and Israel have not changed their strategies, but have become more crazy. According to CCTV and other countries, Israel launched an attack on the Jabaliya refugee camp in northern Gaza, killing more than 100 people on the spot, and more people were buried under the building, which is equivalent to directly "burying alive". Combined with the local "rescue" capabilities, it is estimated that not many will survive. It is reported that Israel used a "heavy bomb" provided by the United States this time, so my personal guess is that it is estimated that the buried people will have varying degrees of disability even if they survive.
Israeli attack on Gaza first: the greater the international ** pressure, the frenzied "strangulation" of the United States and Israel. It has been learned that the United States has provided Israel with about 100 BLU-109 ground-piercing armor-piercing bombs. This bomb can carry a 1-ton warhead, which is simply a "disaster" for civilian buildings, and to a certain extent, even underground pillboxes can be easily blown up. In this round of attacks, Israel dropped this "weapon of mass destruction" into the refugee camp, because the personnel were relatively dense, so the killing effect was extremely "exaggerated".
Israeli attack on Gaza Second: Combined with Israel's previous request for people in the north to move to the south, I personally believe that it is likely to be a "centralized" ** plan. To put it simply, after driving people to a specific area, increasing the population density of the pair, and reaching a certain "standard", Israel will launch an attack, using the least amount of ammunition and the most people to maximize the efficiency of ammunition. The strongest evidence of this speculation is that Israel has begun to attack refugee camps and has begun to attack the south. To put it mildly, if Israel has decided to move on the whole of Gaza, why should it drive the population to the south?
Survivor third: According to relevant news from the United States: During the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, the United States provided Israel with more than 15,000 bombs and tens of thousands of artillery shells. So to a certain extent, the Palestinian region is now facing a joint effort by Israel and the United States. And the United States** said to the outside world that if it were attacked like Israel, the United States would do "the same thing." This remark also attracted a lot of attention, and some people said: It is indeed because the United States and Israel have done the same thing in history.
Israel attacked the mosque here netizens should be talking about the American Indians, who, like the current Israeli Palestinians, aim to seize other people's "homes". At the same time, the "Israeli self-defense" in the mouth of the United States is also very funny, in the homes of the Palestinians, do the Israelis have the "right of self-defense"?In other words, when a nation or a country encounters aggression, it cannot harm the "enemy" in the process of resistance, is this reasonable?The sophistry of the United States cannot whitewash Israel, and the blood of civilians will keep Israelis alive in a nightmare forever.
Wen Xiaotie).