Xin Qiji is an ancient bold lyricist, and his famous work "Breaking the Array, Giving Strong Words to Chen Tongfu to Send It" profoundly outlines the ideals of the Northern Expedition and the image of a military general. This ancient text has caused controversy and has been accused of being removed from the textbook, but the rationale behind this is worth revisiting.
Ancient Literature Review: Misunderstanding Xin Qi Disease?
In recent years, some "parents" and "brick families" have reviewed Chinese textbooks, claiming that some ancient texts have value problems and advocating their deletion. However, such scrutiny is in most cases far-fetched.
Misunderstanding: The criticism of ancient texts is unreasonable.
These voices accuse the idea of "foolish loyalty" or the tendency to attack profit in ancient texts, such as "the matter of the king and the world" in "Breaking the Array" is misunderstood as foolish loyalty. However, the understanding of Xin Qiji's lifelong ambition is one-sided.
Beyond Misunderstanding: Xin Qiji and "Loyalty".
Xin Qiji's ideal was the Northern Expedition, but the Southern Song Dynasty monarch's idea of being partial to peace was contrary to his wishes. The "king's affairs in the world" in the article does not refer to a specific monarch, but to the fit between Xin Qiji's personal aspirations and national interests.
Diverse values: fame and fortune coexist.
The ancients had a pluralistic attitude towards fame and fortune, and it was not inappropriate to gain fame and profit. There is no contradiction between the thinking of ancient hermits and the pursuit of fame and fortune, and society is motivated and progressive due to the diversity of values.
Behind the scenes: Interpreting the deep meaning of ancient texts.
The "loyalty" involved in the ancient texts is not blind loyalty, but loyalty to one's own ideals. The way of thinking of the ancients was deeply influenced by the times and social systems, and loyalty to the monarch was an expression of loyalty to the country.
Beyond Misunderstanding: The Values of the Ancients.
Ancient China has always admired "the monarch is not righteous and the minister goes to a foreign country", and the ancients were not unconditional for loyalty to the monarch, but based on the adherence to social interests. The misunderstanding of Zhongjun may be partly a misinterpretation of the ancient text.
Revisited: The True Meaning of Xin Qiji.
Xin Qiji's "the affairs of the king and the world" is not really loyal to the king, but an expression of his own ideals. His ambitions for the Northern Expedition were not supported and eventually became a dream dream.
Reflection and conclusion.
The examination of ancient texts requires rational thinking, beyond one-sided interpretation and misunderstanding. In ancient times, there were multiple values, and loyalty to the monarch was not blind obedience, but a loyal expression of one's own ideals and national interests. Examining ancient texts requires more in-depth understanding and objective judgment.
Xin Qiji: Values and the Examination of Ancient Texts
In recent years, the censorship of ancient texts has once again sparked heated discussions in society. In this debate, Xin Qiji's famous work "Breaking the Formation and Giving Strong Words to Chen Tongfu to Send It" became the focus of controversy. This ancient text is accused of "foolish loyalty" and aggressive tendencies, prompting reflections on ancient values and the rationality of censorship.
In my opinion, this censorship is, to some extent, a misunderstanding and misinterpretation of ancient cultures. The "affairs of the king and the world" that exists in the ancient texts is not simply loyal to the monarch, but the expression of Xin Qiji's personal ideal of the Northern Expedition. What he pursued was not blind obedience to the monarch, but adherence to the ideals of the state and the individual.
Examining ancient texts requires more objectivity and in-depth understanding. Culture, era, and social background are all important factors in understanding ancient literary works. When dealing with the examination of ancient texts, we cannot simply judge the values and codes of conduct of the ancients from a modern perspective.
The ancients' attitude towards fame and fortune was diverse, and winning fame and profit was not seen as an improper move. In ancient times, the hermit mindset coexisted with the pursuit of fame and fortune, and this pluralistic value reflected the complexity and inclusiveness of ancient society.
The examination of ancient texts needs to avoid overly one-sided interpretations and misunderstandings. Ancient values are not static, and loyalty to the monarch is not unconditional and blind. On the contrary, the ancients' idea of loyalty to the monarch is an expression of personal ideals and national interests, and an adherence to the common interests of society.
Therefore, the examination of ancient texts requires more objectivity and in-depth thinking. When judging ancient literary works, we should know more about and respect the historical background, social environment, and cultural context of the ancients. In this way, we can better understand and interpret ancient literary works, and avoid unreasonable censorship and criticism of them because of one-sided misunderstandings.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!