In today's society, parents and their children are vividly depicted as being intimate when not involved in schoolwork, and screaming when it comes to schoolwork.
Parents attach great importance to their children's education and are eager for their children to study hard and Xi in the future.
However, children are still young, their thinking is not yet mature, they lack awareness of the importance of academic Xi, and most of them are indifferent to their studies and even have an antipathetic attitude.
In order to stimulate their children's interest in learning Xi, many parents have chosen to sign up for remedial Xi classes. However, with the implementation of the double reduction policy, many supplementary Xi classes have been closed, and the rest have also changed their faces.
In schools, teachers supervise students' studies, but after school, parents who do not want their children's grades to slip are forced to fight themselves.
In this scene, there is often a state of "out of control". No matter how good-tempered a parent is, it is often difficult to contain the inner impatience when tutoring their children's academics.
In the face of children who are unwilling to learn Xi, parents can often only use the most primitive means to punish them. Although this is not advocated, it is undeniable that the effect seems to be good.
Parents showed a significant difference in quality when comparing students' homework "before and after being beaten". Lele, a primary school student, has been in the Xi of the nursery class before the implementation of the double reduction policy, and has been tutored by the teachers. However, after the implementation of the policy, Lele could only be guided by his mother in person. After a few days of tutoring, my mother found that Lele's homework was useless, procrastinating, and her handwriting was even more sloppy.
The mother had a great headache, and although she tried to communicate to no avail, she finally inflicted corporal punishment on Lele in a fit of rage.
Surprisingly, after the corporal punishment, Lele not only completed the homework quickly, but also became very good in quality. Mom herself couldn't believe it, as if the words were printed from a book.
The mother shared a comparison chart of the student's homework before and after being beaten online, which attracted widespread attention. The comparison chart does show a world of difference in the quality of the work.
In the case of math homework, for example, the homework before corporal punishment was not only sloppy and beyond the scope of the grid, but the answers were correct but lacked the necessary calculation process. This type of question usually requires a "de-form" calculation, otherwise it will be difficult to score even if the answer is correct.
In the math homework after corporal punishment, the process is clear and complete, the numbers are neat and orderly, and even the horizontal lines are drawn with a ruler.
In addition, with regard to language homework, before being corporal punishment, there seems to be a lack of seriousness in writing, which is more like sloppy graffiti, not detailed enough. And after corporal punishment, the font is generous and neat, like a little calligrapher, which is eye-catching, and my mother is very satisfied with this.
Different opinions have emerged on the Internet about what moms are doing. Some netizens jokingly called it "beating effect", and some people thought that this seemed to open up the second vein of Ren and Du, and thought that there was nothing wrong with the mother's approach.
However, some netizens also expressed their opposition, insisting that children should not be beaten, advocating treating them with warmth, and believing that children are used to pamper rather than punish.
A netizen shared a real case around him, pointing out that a student's grades improved after receiving corporal punishment, but this method led to the emergence of psychological problems in students and became the object of questioning.
In fact, there is no set pattern when it comes to educating students. Each student's personality is unique, with some being too sensible to be too much to worry about, while others may require stricter constraints to be effective. Therefore, it is acceptable to adopt a student-specific approach and to occasionally use appropriate means.
In order to improve student achievement, parents need to start with the root cause. While moderation of "tidying up" students may have some effect, it does not address the root cause of the problem, so parents should not rely too much on this means.
As students get older, this approach can be counterproductive and exacerbate students' rebellious mentality. Therefore, parents should dig deep into the reasons behind it and not scold rashly.
First of all, parents need to communicate patiently with their students, guide them to express the difficulties they encounter in their Xi, find the root cause of the problem, and then solve the problem.
Parents should try to stay calm and give students enough time to think when tutoring their Xi. Don't lose your temper when you see a student making a mistake or delaying an answer. While these questions may be simple for adults, they are a difficult task for beginners, so it is normal to understand that students take longer to think, and parents should remain calm.
Finally, parents need to find out whether the main reason for the poor performance of primary school students is a problem of attitude or a gap in knowledge. With a clear direction and targeted training, I believe that through such efforts, the performance of primary school students will definitely improve.
Topic discussion
Do you find "stick education" useful?