The incident of an associate professor of Peking University entering the school gate "hurdles" has sparked discussions among many netizens. It is rumored that the gatekeeper is no stranger to the identity of the faculty member, so he will not block the entry of the associate professor. However, an unwitting security guard saw the scene of the associate professor "hurdling" into the campus, so he started a "chase" on the campus.
At one point, the security guard chased on foot, but the associate professor was fast across the campus and the security guard was unable to catch up. So, the security guard hurriedly got on his bicycle and picked up the speed. Presumably this is a unique cycling chase, and the picture is comparable to the good scene in the movie. And this scene caused the laughter and attention of many passers-by.
In the end, the associate professor showed his work card to prove his identity, and the security guard gave up. However, when the associate professor left the campus again, he was stopped again because he did not have facial recognition permissions. Faced with this situation, the associate professor had to "hurdle" away again.
This incident makes people wonder if there is still room for improvement in Peking University's access control system. The access control system is set up to ensure the safety and order of the school, but it is undeniable that too cumbersome documents and processes will cause inconvenience and delay to teachers and students. Many students expressed a desire to return to their previous relaxed state and open the school gates for easy access.
The "hurdle" incident of an associate professor at Peking University has attracted the attention of a professor at Tsinghua University. According to his post, he learned from a certain Peking master that the access control system of Peking University has changed. It turns out that faculty and staff will no longer need facial recognition when driving into the school, and they will no longer need to swipe their faces when walking out of the school. However, walking to enter the school still requires face verification. This change shows the adjustment and improvement of the access control system of Peking University. It doesn't change much, but it's better than nothing.
In this regard, Professor Tsinghua believes that although this change has not caused a lot of heated discussions, it is an improvement and a kind of progress compared with the previous practice. He hoped that Peking University could maintain a free, open, inclusive, and leading atmosphere, and not be too closed and not allow itself to become isolated from the world.
There has been an ongoing debate about whether to close college campuses. It has been argued that universities have traditionally been open to the outside world and have not had major problems. Nowadays, however, more and more people are entering campuses not for the purpose of learning. Some people set foot on college campuses just to shoot short ** and use the campus as a traffic password. This situation has undoubtedly affected the learning atmosphere of the students.
Maintaining the learning atmosphere of students and reducing the interference of outsiders is the benefit of the closed management of university campuses. Closed management ensures the safety of teachers and students, allowing them to focus on their academics and research. In addition, the closure of the campus also protects the privacy of students and prevents criminals from infringing on them.
However, the closed management has also brought certain troubles to the entry and exit of teachers and students. It may be necessary to go through complex security procedures and inspection processes, which increases the time cost of access. For some schools, student access management may require additional human and material resources, which puts a certain burden on the school.
Based on the above points, the question of whether university campuses should be closed or not needs to be decided according to the characteristics and needs of the schools themselves. Closed management has its advantages and disadvantages, and there is a trade-off between safety and student rights.
Access control on university campuses has always been a topic of great concern. The "hurdle" incident of an associate professor at Peking University has sparked discussions and reflections on campus access control. Whether it is closed or open depends on the characteristics of the school and the importance it places on student safety and academic atmosphere.
Closed management helps to ensure the safety and academic environment of teachers and students, and prevents criminals from entering the campus. However, overly strict access control regulations may cause certain restrictions and troubles for teachers, students and outsiders to enter and exit.
It can be seen from the change of access control in Peking University that there is still room for improvement in the adjustment of the access control system of the school. Fully considering the actual needs of students and faculty members, and reducing unnecessary cumbersome procedures, is beneficial to the development of the school and the development of teachers and students.
To sum up, the access control system on a university campus needs to strike a balance between security and convenience. The school should formulate a scientific and reasonable access control policy according to the actual situation to ensure the safety of teachers and students and a good academic environment. At the same time, all sectors of society should also fully discuss and think about the closed management of university campuses, and jointly create a safe and open educational environment.