Love and marriage are two different things. But many people are stunned to draw an equal sign between these two words, and as a result, they not only lose their love, but also tire their marriage to death, and make up their lives.
The word love itself is a foreign product. It is a foreign gadget that was transmitted to Japan from the West and then from Japan to China. As far as the original meaning of the word love is concerned, it is something in the philosophical category, it is metaphysical, and it sounds so ethereal. But now it is indeed a fashion, as if it is a kind of romance, in fact, he can't stand the test of time, so he floats in the air, mysterious and mysterious. It's simply a noun that can't fall on the ground, let alone in marriage.
Marriage is a real thing, it is the oil, salt, firewood, rice, sauce, vinegar and tea in life. It's realistic, and of course it's mother-in-law's. Generally speaking, marriage is a union of men and women combined. And now it has developed into a share*** Everyone is a shareholder in marriage.
Marriage is like a production type of association or shares*** Since it is a consortium or a joint-stock company, it may be dissolved at any time, and it can also go bankrupt at any time. Because now marriage is highly competitive, highly **, highly financialized, and secularized. This is the true nature and destination of marriage.
Writer Su Qin said: "When marriage reaches middle age, most of them are dead. It's just trapped in responsibility, children, face, and the stable life in front of you. The cost of talking about divorce is too great, and talking about love is like a joke, and it has gradually become a contractual relationship that only talks about things, not about hearts."
In the traditional culture of the ancestors, it is often said that it is better to demolish a temple than to destroy a marriage. Now it seems that this sentence has little meaning. has already been beaten to the ground by reality. Divorce rates in some places have reached or exceeded 50 per cent. It shows that marriage is already like a piece of clothing, just like a pair of shoes, if you don't want to wear it or it is uncomfortable to wear, it will be thrown away or taken off.
Therefore, many emotional programs are still doing stupid things of persuasion and non-persuasion. I think that the marriage of a man and a woman is good to the end, and the bad is abandoned. But nowadays both men and women are not good, so marriage is a child's play.
Of course, marriage can be managed, just like a consortium and a company, you not only have to throw money into it, but you also have to learn how to throw money into it. Only then will the consortium and the company survive. One day you run out of money, and the consortium or company will dissolve and collapse. This seems to be the dialectic of marriage.
Marriage can naturally be opened into a century-old store, and it is also natural that it can also close its doors or open a bankrupt company. If you are willing to run this marriage like your ancestors and become a century-old business, maybe marriage is the real marriage. And when you don't throw money into it, you can't open a century-old store.
Marriage is like a roadside shop, there are many people who open their doors every day, and there are many people who close their doors every day. Is this a true portrayal of a future marriage?Absolutely. Because today's marriages are financial companies maintained or piled up with money, luxury cars and bungalows. Or high-rise buildings based on money, luxury cars and bungalows. Without money, luxury cars and bungalows, high-rise buildings will definitely capsize.
In this way, marriage is the difference between a single bed and a double bed, a single bed is a double bed, and if you don't want a marriage, you can change it to a single bed.
Marriages are almost all terminally ill and incurable, no matter how much you can do it. But if you have a lot of money, if your dad is a billionaire and has inexhaustible free wealth, then the marriage may last until your dad goes bankrupt. But such a marriage can't help but put a foot in the little three.
The love story of Marx and Yanni is great because there is no money as a bond, no equivalent exchange. So he is great. But in my mind, this can only be a fairy tale that happened in the past, and it will never be possible in the future. In the contemporary, in the modern age, no one is qualified to preach that his own marriage is primitive and simple, not equivalent to exchange.
Marriage is now a sale, a real deal. In addition to exchanging money, your hue, your wealth, your stature, your education, especially your real estate, your luxury car, and the amount of money in the bank are all equivalent exchange for marriage, so marriage is often in the free market.
Xiao San is the best thing in marriage, and no marriage can help Xiao San to blow up like this. It is a common thing to blow up a hole and get it out, and it is all caused by money. If there is no money, where will the junior come from?So many marriages are shared marriages. Today you can share him, she can share him. Tomorrow he can share you, you can share her today, he can share you him, but the root is to share money. Whoever has money and wealth will have the capital to share marriage, which is the dialectic of marriage.
In fact, marriage is like a pot of old tea, boiling love and drinking water. The result of boiling tea and drinking brewed tea is to drink water. The more the tea is boiled, the purer it is, it is equivalent to love, and the more the tea is drunk, the lighter it becomes, just like marriage. If love exists, it is as ephemeral as the process of making tea. And marriage is like drinking tea, you have to drink it every day. At first you drink tea, maybe the taste is still strong, and in the end you drink only water, or even drink it until it is boring. It's as simple as that.