Now netizens often complain about themselves in the comment area, and the housing prices of the old communities they bought have fallen sharply, and they don't know if they want to cut the meat quickly.
After all, most of today's home buyers are post-90s and post-00s, and their requirements for the living environment are not low.
There are no elevators in the buildings in the old community, which discourages many young people. In addition, the design of the old community is outdated, there is no greenery in the community, and the property is also furnished, living in such a community, it feels like being poor and the mood will be very bad.
Although there is now a policy of old renovation, some old communities have been renovated both externally and internally, such as painting, replacing water and electricity pipes, etc. There are also some communities that will make some simple plans for greenery and parking spaces.
But these are only superficial efforts, the type of the old community still can't be changed, and many communities have no way to install elevators.
On the one hand, the low-rise residents are unwilling, and on the other hand, even if there is a state subsidy, the owners still have to pay out of pocket, which is a big expense for the original owners. Therefore, nationwide, there are still many old communities that cannot install elevators.
At the beginning, many people bought old communities because they had good school districts, or they were looking forward to demolition, but now there are fewer and fewer opportunities for demolition, and only those old communities that obstruct roads, subways or dilapidated houses can be demolished, and others can only rely on old reforms.
While everyone has lost confidence in the old community, some cities have opened a new model, making the old community a "sweet pastry" again.
First, the old community, can the old be exchanged for the new?
Recently, it was reported that state-owned enterprises in Taicang City bought a number of old and damaged second-hand houses from the people in the form of trade-in. These second-hand homes will be converted into affordable housing for low-income families.
The original homeowner can use the preferential ** to buy a new house developed by a state-owned enterprise and improve his living conditions.
In this way, the first increase in affordable housing, the demand for improvement has also been met, and at the same time, it has also promoted the destocking and activity of the real estate market, which is a good policy for a win-win situation.
This model is not the first time that this model has appeared in Taicang City, as early as 2019, Taicang City launched a "trade-in" pilot, and the goal at that time was to acquire 150,000 old houses have been transformed into affordable housing, while the original owners can choose to exchange for new houses in several new projects in Taicang City.
It is understood that these new projects are all undertaken by state-owned enterprises, with superior locations, high-end quality, and reasonable, and there are certain preferential policies, such as exemption from property fees, parking fees, etc.
The benefits of this model are obvious, for the original owners, they can exchange for a better living environment at a lower cost, improve their quality of life, and also enjoy the high-quality services of state-owned enterprises.
For state-owned enterprises, they can fulfill their social responsibilities by acquiring old housing and increasing the number of affordable housing, and at the same time, they can also achieve capital returns through the sale of new houses and funds.
For the real estate market, this model can effectively remove the stock and promote the healthy development of the market, and at the same time, it can also improve the overall image of the city and improve the living environment of the city.
Taicang is not the only city to implement this model, and some cities in Jiangsu and Zhejiang have taken a similar approach to help people replace their old homes, although state-owned enterprises are less likely to do so, and in many cases require the help of intermediaries.
However, these old residences that were ** by state-owned enterprises were not paid to the original owners in cash, but in the form of house tickets.
The original owner can choose his favorite new house among several high-quality projects undertaken by state-owned enterprises with the help of the house ticket. Of course, there is also a principle that the value of an old house cannot exceed 60% of the value of a new house.
The purpose of this is to prevent the original owners from cashing out, but to encourage them to buy new houses, but also to ensure the liquidity of state-owned enterprises and avoid financial difficulties.
Second, some special communities will also face demolition
Although there are fewer and fewer opportunities for demolition and relocation, it is not impossible, but it depends on whether your community has some special conditions.
Generally speaking, old communities with the following two situations are more likely to be demolished:
1. An old community located in the ** area of the city center
This kind of community is characterized by superior geographical location, convenient transportation, and complete surrounding facilities, but the conditions of the community itself are very poor, the houses are aging, the facilities are outdated, and the environment is dirty, which seriously affects the appearance of the city.
The existence of this kind of community is not only a waste of the city, but also an injustice to the residents, because although they live in the best area, they cannot enjoy the best life.
The demolition of this kind of community can make the central area of the city better planned and constructed, improve the quality and image of the city, and at the same time allow the original residents to obtain higher compensation and resettlement, so that they can enjoy better living conditions and living standards.
2. Old residential areas that have affected urban planning
This kind of community is characterized by remote location, inconvenient transportation, and lack of surrounding facilities, but it occupies some important urban functional areas, such as commercial areas, industrial areas, education areas, etc.
The existence of this kind of community is not only a drag on the city, but also a disadvantage to the residents, because although they live in the functional area, they do not enjoy the convenience of the function.
The demolition of this kind of community can make the functional areas of the city better planned and constructed, improve the efficiency and competitiveness of the city, and at the same time, it can also allow the original residents to obtain higher compensation and resettlement, so that they can enjoy better living conditions and living standards.
Write at the end
Old residential areas are a difficult problem in urban development and a pain point in residents' lives. How to improve the old community and satisfy the residents is a process that requires multi-party cooperation and efforts.
At present, some cities have started some new models, so that the old community has become a "sweet and sweet" again, so that residents can see hope again. These models, whether they are trade-in or demolition and resettlement, have their own advantages and limitations, and they need to be reasonably selected and implemented according to specific circumstances and needs.