Everyone who has just upgraded to a parent wants to be able to give their baby the best care and attention. However, in the choiceConfinement sister-in-lawIn this crucial step, Ms. Yang and her husband encountered a late regret. Those who originally took up their posts after passing professional trainingConfinement sister-in-lawEven the most basic feeding was done so improperly that the baby was hospitalized for ten days and was diagnosed with improper feedingPremature babies。This made the couple deeply worried and regretful, and also caused a dispute about the attribution of responsibility and compensation.
Ms. Yang gave birth to her baby in May. When they were still in the hospital, they met a specialistConfinement sister-in-lawRecommended, the other party claimed that he had undergone professional training in the hospital and **, and was very professional. The couple was moved by their words and hoped to passConfinement sister-in-lawcan provide better care for the baby. However, it turned out that they regretted this decision. Originally, it was just hopeConfinement sister-in-lawAble to take better care of the baby, but the result is that the baby is severely hungry and underfed, which leads to increased jaundice and has to be hospitalized for ** for ten full days.
Extension 1: As new parents, Ms. Yang and her husband are full of trust and expectation for the feeding of their baby. They believeConfinement sister-in-lawThrough professional training, you have the knowledge and skills to take care of your baby. However,Confinement sister-in-law's misconduct made them doubt their decisions and caused them regret and anxiety. They begin to doubt their own judgment and feel that they are not choosing a truly reliable one for their babyConfinement sister-in-law
Ms. Yang mentionedConfinement sister-in-lawOn the first day of the household, the baby was hungry and seriously underfed. Within 24 hours, they had to add formula twice to meet their baby's needs. This led to an increase in the baby's jaundice, which eventually led to a full 10-day hospitalization**. The diagnosis certificate of the Children's Hospital of Zhejiang University also clearly pointed out that the baby had a newbornHyperbilirubinemia, improper feeding andPremature babiesand so on.
Extension 2:BreastfeedingIt is essential for the healthy development of your baby. However, due toConfinement sister-in-lawThe baby is not fed enough, resulting in increased jaundice. Jaundice not only poses a risk to the baby's physical health, but also brings great psychological pressure and financial burden to the whole family. The baby's hospitalization** not only delayed his growth and development, but also caused unbearable financial pressure on their parents, Ms. Yang and her husband.
For the reason for the baby's hospitalization, Ms. Yang andConfinement sister-in-lawThere are different ways of saying it. Confinement sister-in-lawSister Yang said that in the first two days of her next household, the baby's mental state was very good. She even suggested that the father take the baby to the hospital for jaundice check-up two days later to ensure the baby's safety. However, Ms. Yang and her husband did not let inConfinement sister-in-lawI went to the hospital with me, but I took the baby with me. The results of the examination revealed that the baby had severe jaundice and was subsequently hospitalized**.
Extension 3: Attribution of responsibility has become the core issue of this dispute. Confinement sister-in-lawSister Yang insisted that she had done nothing wrong while taking care of the baby, and that jaundice was caused by the congenital system. However, Ms. Yang disagrees, believing that improper feeding of babies is the main cause of increased jaundice. The parties disagreed on the division of liability, which directly affected the subsequent issue of compensation.
Ms. Yang filed a claim for compensation for the expenses incurred during her hospitalization. She proposed an amount of 30,000 yuan in compensation, which included moral damages and claims".Love treasure"Refund of service fees charged, etc. In the face of Ms. Yang's request,Love treasureThe person in charge of the company said that they did not know the process in the middle, but they agreed to send someone to accompany the couple to consult a medical expert to find out whether the baby's condition was caused by a congenital constitutionConfinement sister-in-lawCaused by improper care.
Extension 4: The issue of compensation is crucial to the resolution of this dispute. For Ms. Yang and her husband, they hope that they will be compensated mentally and financially through compensation to make up for the effort and financial costs they have put into their baby's hospitalization**. WhileLove treasureCompanies need to clarify who is responsible and determine what it isConfinement sister-in-law's negligence caused the baby's problems, or the baby's own system caused the hospitalization**.
Through this incident, we reflect on what we do as parents in our choicesConfinement sister-in-lawto make an informed decision. Whether it's through recommendations or looking for it on your ownConfinement sister-in-law, should pay attention to the understanding and confirmation of their professional background and quality. At the same time, inConfinement sister-in-lawDuring the service, parents should also pay close attention to the baby's condition, identify and solve problems in time, and ensure the baby's health and safety. On the issue of liability and compensation, both parties should put the interests of the baby first, and resolve the dispute through expert advice and mediation to protect the rights and interests of the baby. This incident has also reminded relevant departments and agencies to strengthen their effortsConfinement sister-in-lawIndustry regulation and training to ensure that newborns receive quality care.