Welcome to the history of the Commonwealth of Independent States, revealing the rise and fall of the CIS.
Today, on the 30th anniversary of the collapse of the Soviet Union, which we often talk about, few people know that at the time of the collapse of the Soviet Union, there was a little-known organization - the Commonwealth of Independent States, or CIS for short. This article will provide an in-depth analysis of the story behind the collapse of the Soviet Union and uncover the 30 years of the CIS.
The collapse of the Soviet Union: a fork in the road of history.
December 25, 1991 is Christmas in the West and the day of the collapse of the Soviet Union. In a televised speech, Soviet commander Mikhail Gorbachev announced that the collapse of the Soviet Union had become history, and the tricolor Russian flag was raised, replacing the Soviet flag that had been flying for 69 years. However, the USSR existed in name only half a month ago.
On December 8, 1991, in Belovezh, Belarus, Yeltsin of Russia, Kravchuk of Ukraine, and Shushkevich, Chairman of the Supreme Soviet of Belarus, met. The three parties signed an agreement on the creation of the Commonwealth of Independent States, declaring that the USSR would cease to exist, and the CIS came into being. At this moment, the Soviet Union had already dissolved de jure, and the CIS officially entered the stage of history.
The Birth of the CIS: Intrigue and the Yeltsin Effect.
The collapse of the Soviet Union was not a single-handedly decision of Gorbachev, but the result of the Yeltsin effect. Yeltsin, as Russia, occupied 80% of the territory of the Soviet Union, 60% of the population, and more than 80% of its economic strength, making the Soviet Union cease to exist after Yeltsin announced its withdrawal. The creation of the CIS became a legal means of actually declaring the death of the USSR.
Yeltsin's ambitions and the regeneration of the USSR.
Despite the collapse of the Soviet Union, Yeltsin was not just a bare-bones commander, he had much more ambitious goals. The disintegration of the Soviet Union was one of Yeltsin's means of seizing power, and at the same time he hoped to reunite the former Soviet states through the CIS. However, Yeltsin was mediocre in his ability to govern the country, and the whole of Russia fell into chaos under his leadership.
Intrigue and disagreement: The CIS member states are moving towards centrifugation.
The CIS was founded to unite the countries of the former Soviet Union, but in reality, this organization has played little role over the past 30 years. The membership was dwindling, and the survival of the Organization was in jeopardy. All that remained of Gorbachev was the last rubber stamp, and the Soviet Union had substantially disintegrated long before the CIS was formed.
Intrigue and division: turbulent years for CIS member states.
The CIS initially had 12 member states, but over time the membership gradually decreased. Turkmenistan declared a neutral withdrawal, Georgia and Ukraine withdrew due to war and dispute, respectively. Today, theoretically only nine countries remain in the CIS, and the divisions between the member states are deepening.
The Future of the CIS: Between Survival and Death.
For 30 years, the existence of the CIS has been almost forgotten. Tensions between member states are growing, especially in the context of international politics. While Belarus has good relations with Russia, the future of the organization as a whole remains precarious.
Epilogue. The CIS, a transitional product of the collapse of the Soviet Union, is a little-known chapter in the history of the Soviet Union. Over the past 30 years, the international organization has drifted apart from the political turmoil, and the divisions among its member states have deepened. Behind the collapse of the Soviet Union were intrigues and differences, the influence of the Yeltsin effect, and the rise and fall of the CIS. This history may fade away in people's memory, but the story behind it is still worth pondering.
This paper analyzes in detail the period of the collapse of the Soviet Union and the formation of the CIS, and deeply analyzes the impact of the Yeltsin effect on the collapse of the Soviet Union, as well as the rise and decline of the CIS in the long history. At this moment in history, full of intrigue and change, the article is fascinating, making it clearer about the political wrangling behind the collapse of the Soviet Union and the rise and fall of international organizations.
First of all, the article gives a detailed description of the time node of the collapse of the Soviet Union, especially emphasizing the power game between the Soviet Union Gorbachev and Yeltsin. Revealing the disintegration is not just a political decision, it is a complex power game, especially highlighting Yeltsin's ambition to seize power through the collapse of the Soviet Union. This gives readers a deeper understanding of the political inside story behind the collapse of the Soviet Union.
Secondly, the article provides an in-depth analysis of the formation and original intentions of the CIS, as well as the withdrawal and contradictions of the member states in the turbulent years that followed. By combing through the historical development of the CIS, the article clearly points out that although the CIS formally replaced the Soviet Union, its actual operation did not meet the expectations of the early days. The article skillfully uses the theme of "power and division" to reveal the power struggle and the contradictions between countries within the CIS, which makes the future of this international organization very bleak.
The article also elaborates on the withdrawal of member states, taking Turkmenistan, Georgia and Ukraine as examples, and analyzes the reasons for their withdrawal, in which wars, disputes, and geopolitical factors have become the main reasons for the withdrawal of member states. Such an analysis allows the reader to better understand the complex situation in which domestic and foreign factors are intertwined in the CIS member states.
Finally, the article looks forward to the future of the CIS, and clearly points out that in the current international political context, the CIS is facing existential pressure. The article expresses concerns about the future of this international organization, highlighting in particular the tensions between member states, which make readers wonder about the fate of the CIS.
Overall, the article is well-structured, logically clear, and provides an in-depth interpretation of the complex history of the collapse of the Soviet Union and the CIS. Through a comprehensive analysis of intrigue, division, and the future, readers gain a deeper understanding of this tortuous and dramatic period of history.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!