As the saying goes, people die for money, and birds die for food, and this sentence is equally applicable between countries. Whether it is an individual or a country, they all have things they care about, they all have their own bottom lines, and they all have their own core interests.
In the 5,000-year-old cultural inheritance of China, wars and turmoil have broken out, and in the tide of development for 5,000 years, wars and wars have not stopped. Since the period of the Yellow Emperor and Emperor Yandi, my country has waged a fierce war with the Chiyou Group. Although many people oppose war, believing that it costs people and money, leads to the decline of the country, and causes innocent deaths, war is also a catalyst for national development and integration.
However, when it comes to war, many people think of the Kosovo War more than 20 years ago. In that war, the United States blew up our embassy, but afterwards made a simple apology, and countless Chinese people were furious and hoped to retaliate against the United States. At that time, why didn't our country fight back?
My country's army was invincible back then, why did it choose to endure humiliation and not fight back?
After the founding of the People's Republic of China, our country fought a total of 8 battles, all of which ended in the victory of our country. At that time, our country was invincible and invincible. Even the invincible United States has to be respectful in front of my ** people. This powerful army is believed to have been fought out of the blood and rain of corpses under the leadership of the first generation of party leaders.
However, with the development of the times, the global mainstream has gradually become peace and development, and there is no longer a world fight. Through the two world wars, the world has been deeply suffering, and people have begun to reflect on why they are fighting world wars, why they are invading other countries, and how they can contain militarism.
My embassy was bombed 20 years ago, why didn't my country fight back?
More than 20 years ago, the United States blew up our embassy and apologized briefly, leaving our people outraged. At that time, there were people in the country who proposed reprisals, and some people took to the streets to demonstrate. However, in the end, our country maintained reason and restraint, and only lost face, and the United States also expressed its apologies for this incident.
If the United States does not exercise restraint and China rashly retaliates, the consequences will be unimaginable. During the war with Yugoslavia, the United States may mistakenly believe that our country shares the same hatred as Yugoslavia, triggering a larger-scale battle. My country, which pursues a strategy of peaceful development, does not wish to fight, and has therefore chosen to exercise restraint.
The deep-seated reasons why our country does not fight back.
In addition to restraint, there were other reasons why our country chose not to fight back at that time. Before attacking Yugoslavia, the United States demonstrated its military strength in a battle in the Middle East called the Battle of the Gulf. Our country has begun to think about how to deal with international contradictions at a deeper level.
Before the Iraq war, the military power of the United States was not fully demonstrated. The world was shocked by the tacit cooperation and offensive methods of the US team, and even Russia, which inherited the background of the former Soviet Union, could not compete with it. With the support of the economy, the United States is equipped with new equipment every year, forming a huge military advantage.
At that time, China's GDP was not the second largest in the world, and the military gap was quite large. Reckless action could lead to huge costs for our country, so the country has chosen a peaceful solution from a long-term perspective. Through the apologies of the United States and NATO, our country has regained face and its damaged international status has been restored.
If our country does not fight back, it will achieve a peaceful rise.
China chooses to deal rationally with international contradictions and resolve them by peaceful means. This practice shows the demeanor of a great power and has been recognized by countries around the world. American politicians may now regret that our country is no longer the country it once was bullied. The endurance of humiliation and heavy burdens in those years has won China more than 20 years of opportunities for peaceful development, and enabled China to rise into a world economic and military power.
Epilogue. 
The contradictions between China and the United States still exist, but after the plane collision in the South China Sea, China chose to forgive the United States generously. The rest of the world should learn more Xi from our country, especially Russia and Ukraine. China has won international respect by generously and peacefully resolving contradictions, while the United States is unable to repent.
In this article, the author reviews in detail the incident of the bombing of our embassy more than 20 years ago, deeply analyzes the reasons why my country did not choose to fight back at that time, and analyzes the impact of this decision on my country from multiple perspectives. As a reviewer, I strongly agree with the views and analysis of this article.
First of all, the article fully criticized the rationality and restraint of our country's decision not to fight back at that time. In international relations, rationality and restraint are of paramount importance, and our country's choice at that time reflected the demeanor of a great power. The article points out that if China chooses to fight back, it may lead to a larger-scale battle and bring great suffering to the world. This long-term strategic vision and contribution to global peace are worthy of recognition.
Second, the article's analysis of China's military strength and international status at that time was also in place. Through the observation of the military strength displayed by the United States in the Gulf Campaign in the Middle East and the Iraq War, Japan has begun to think about how to deal with international contradictions at a deeper level. The article emphasizes Japan's adherence to peace and the international respect it has achieved through rational treatment of contradictions.
It is worth mentioning that through a review of the current situation at that time, the article revealed the wisdom of China's choice not to fight back. In the face of a strong enemy, China's decision-making not only protects the country's core interests, but also avoids the quagmire of possible war. By maintaining rationality and restraint, our country has maintained the country's face, contributed to the restoration of its international status, and finally achieved the opportunity for a peaceful rise.
The conclusion at the end of the article further emphasizes China's image as a great power and the path of peaceful development. By generously forgiving and peacefully resolving conflicts, our country has won widespread recognition on the world stage. This is a positive example for other countries, especially in the context of the current turbulent international situation, where rationality and restraint have become the key to maintaining global peace and stability.
To sum up, this article provides a profound analysis of China's decision not to fight back more than 20 years ago, and comprehensively shows the international background and China's wise choice at that time. Through an in-depth analysis of historical events, readers can better understand the situation of our country at that time and the wisdom of decision-making. This kind of review of history helps us to better understand and respond to the current international situation.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!