**Explode in '69!What does he think about the war?
**Explode in '69!This is no ordinary meeting, but a sparkling debate. At that time, ** expounded his views on war, and passionately mentioned: "War is not only a defensive work, we can't just wait for the rabbit, what we want to emphasize is combat effectiveness!"."It hit the nail on the head and made me think, what are we going to do?".This is just as *** said: "Defending the fortress and waiting for six months, the enemy army is still not right, but appears on the other side, what should we do?".This is the so-called 'hero has no strategy'. ”
The conversation, which took place in 1969, mentioned two key factors in the success of the war: combat effectiveness and concentration of forces. This is not a simple military theory, but a major matter related to ***. He even bluntly said: "More than half of the current defense may be ineffective!".At that time, he reminded us that the commanding heights were more important than the fortifications. It reminds me of some of the moment's scenes.
As the article deepens, we see the root of the problem from this specific incident. War is not about waiting for the enemy to come to the door, but about actively looking for the enemy's weak points and destroying their combat effectiveness. The idea may have been a little ahead of its time at the time, but today we can find many lessons in it.
As some netizens commented: "* Too far-sighted, war is to take the initiative, and you can't always be beaten passively." It seems that we have to sum up this history and learn from his military wisdom. "Indeed, we must not always spend time waiting, but should learn to take the initiative and take the initiative to create a battlefield in our favor.
Speaking about the defense work, ** mentions an interesting phenomenon: "The well-made fortress became a burden for them. "This reminds me of some modern military facilities, is there a similar problem?The fortress is meant to be defended, but if it becomes a burden, it is a big mistake. It makes me wonder if our modern strategy needs to be adjusted as well
If we continue to rely on outdated fortifications, will we lose our flexibility and not be able to cope with different situations because of these "burdens"?This makes me wonder if we will be able to react quickly and not sit back if the enemy forces appear on the other side
As for the deployment of troops, ** made a clear suggestion: "If the forces are not enough to defeat the enemy, consider concentrating your forces so that your own forces outnumber the opponent." "I am deeply impressed by this tough stance. He's not just trying to get balanced, he's trying to make sure we have enough strength to secure victory. This strategy of concentrating forces may be exactly what we need in our modern military.
In the military strategic and tactical point of view, strength and concentration of power are emphasized. These are not just theories, but also valuable lessons for us. We can no longer rely solely on the patterns of the past, but should be more flexible in our use of strategies to make our armies more combative.
Overall, that conversation in '69 still has a profound impact on us today. We can't always be passive defense, but we should learn to take the initiative and make good use of concentrated forces to ensure that our *** As one netizen said: "The military wisdom of * is not only the need of the time, but also our compass today." "In this uncertain world, we need to be more vigilant and ready to deal with all possible threats. ** words are still the beacon for us to move forward.