Recently, a byUnderstand Che DiThe release of the review data caused an uproar. The data shows that in the test of the pure electric range achievement rate of hybrid vehicles under severe cold conditionsHuaweiwithThalysJointly builtM7 extended range versionWith 316 of the data is at the bottom of the list, triggeredYu Chengdongand other car company executives questioned and besieged. EvenTeslaIt also issued a counterproduct, saying that such a test that deviates from industry standards will mislead the public. The reason why this matter has attracted much attention isUnderstand Che DiAs a platform with a large following that has built a good trust among users, the impact of this test result is not small. However, whether the controversy on this matter is due to the reluctance of car companies to admit it, or the test results of the platform are watery, we need to think deeply and **.
1. Doubts from car companies
HuaweiThalysAto carsGreat Wall MotorsGeely AutomobileWait for car companies to be rightUnderstand Che DiThe test results were questioned. They pointed out that there were loopholes in the test and questioned itUnderstand Che DiThe testing process does not comply with the relevant national testing process. The executives of these car companies are focused on the possibility of damage to their interests and are unwilling to let go of the "siege" of the evaluation results.
Analysis: These doubts are mainly based on the consideration of interests. Major automakers are worried that the test results will affect consumers' purchasing behavior, so they have attacked the flaws in the test results. Although whether the test results are true and efficient needs to be further examined, the doubts of car companies have indeed caused large-scale controversy.
2. The platform's justification
Understand Che DiAs a third-party evaluation platform, it issued a statement in response to the doubts of car companies. They said that the test did refer to the relevant national testing process, but also acknowledged that there were some problems in the testing process and promised to further improve the testing method.
Analysis:Understand Che DiAs a platform that lives on the advertising of car companies, it cannot offend too many car companies. After facing the doubts of the car companies, they tried to justify and demonstrate the fairness of the test. However, more evidence is needed to confirm the presence or absence of moisture.
3. Tesla's counterattack
Teslaposted a counterattackUnderstand Che Diand claim that tests that deviate from industry standards can be misleading to the public. They notedTeslaIn the past, it has frequently encountered the phenomenon of manipulation and smearing of evaluations, so it has launched a counterattack against these evaluation agencies.
Analysis:TeslaThe reason for the post's counter-attack is their past experience with negative reviews and their distrust of the review agency. They don't want toUnderstand Che DiThe test results misled consumers, so they also stood up and expressed their opinions.
1. The authority of the third-party test platform
Understand Che DiThe test results have sparked a siege from many car companies. To some extent, these car companies want to use this opportunity to inform third-party evaluation agencies that they are not easy to mess with. This also impliesUnderstand Che DiThere may be some moisture in the test results. However, if the third-party test is flat, even if there is no moisture in the current test, it does not necessarily mean that there will be no moisture in the future. The state needs to strengthen the supervision of third-party testing to ensure the impartiality of test results.
2. Guarantee of fairness and the position of the platform
To ensure the fairness of testing, testbeds need to maintain a neutral stance and adhere to the relevant testing process. However, as a platform that relies on the advertising operation of car companies,Understand Che DiDon't dare to offend too many car companies. This has also led to their evasion in the face of doubts from car companies. As a result, the authenticity of the test results is difficult to guarantee, and it may even be assumed that moisture is present.
3. The trade-off and trust background of evaluation data
Understand Che DiAs a platform with a large audience, its test results have a certain influence on consumers' purchasing behavior. But the results of this test have caused such a large controversy. This also raises the trade-offs between the measurement data, the context of trust, and the evaluation dataReliabilityand other questions.
It's not the first time that the data has been controversial. In the midst of this turmoil, we might as well think about the credibility of the results from two perspectives. On the one hand, there are the doubts of car companies, which focus on the damage to their own interests and try to find out the unreasonableness of the test results. On the other hand, there is the position of the platform, as a third-party evaluation platformUnderstand Che DiIt is necessary to be fair and neutral, and to accept the doubts from car companies and respond to their concerns. From these two perspectives, we can't simply assert that the test results are wet or that car companies are unwilling to admit it, but more evidence and investigation are needed to determine the truth.
In response to this matter, the national regulatory authorities need to strengthen the supervision of third-party evaluation platforms to ensure the fairness of the test results. At the same time, platforms also need to pay more attention to the credibility and fairness of data to avoid damaging the rights and trust of consumers. This turmoil also reminds us that only the fairness of the test can be recognized and supported by the majority of consumers.
In thisInformation**, measurement data has an important impact on consumers' purchasing decisions. As consumers, we should think deeply about the truth behind the evaluation data, and not blindly worship or question it. At the same time, we should also strengthen the awareness of the protection of consumer rights, treat the evaluation data rationally, and pay attention to more information**. After all, a large amount of data and information is not everything, and we need to make a purchase decision that meets our needs and actual situation through multi-party comparison and research.
The controversy over measurement data is not just a current incident, but also an issue that requires widespread attention. We look forward to establishing a fair, authoritative and trusted evaluation organization in the future to provide consumers with more reliable evaluation data and promote the healthy development of the entire auto market." At the same time, we also need to strengthen our awareness of self-protection, have more rational thinking about evaluation data and advertising, and not blindly follow and not be misled.
Finally, for this turmoil, I personally believe that the authenticity of the test results needs more evidence to confirm. As consumers, we need to maintain a rational and objective attitude, and at the same time, we hope that evaluation agencies, car companies and regulators can work together to provide consumers with more fair and reliable evaluation data, paving the way for the healthy development of the entire auto market. Allowing consumers to make more informed choices to buy satisfactory products also promotes the wholeCarsSustainable development of the industry.