The ins and outs of the real incident: Li Zhi, an associate professor at Peking University, has attracted attention because of the campus access control, saying that he did not authorize the school to use his facial recognition information, so he could not swipe his face to enter and exit the school. Due to the long time it takes for the doorman to check his work card, Li Zhi usually stepped directly over the railing of the turnstile to enter the campus, and the doorman knew him and usually did not intercept him. However, on a recent day, security guards chased Lee Sik, and he ended the chase by showing his work ID. When leaving the campus, the doorman asked him to brush his face before leaving the school, but Li Zhi disagreed, and finally chose to leave the hurdle.
Repercussions of the incident on the Internet: This incident sparked heated discussions on the Internet, and related topics rushed to the hot search. On the one hand, some students, faculty and staff believe that university campuses should be open to the public and should not restrict access, and that the current access control measures are too strict. On the other hand, there are also concerns that the influx of people from outside the school will affect the teaching order of the school and bring safety problems. Some people expressed support for Li Zhi's "hurdling" behavior, believing that he reminded universities in a strange way that they should open their gates, reflecting modern governance and the openness of universities.
Similar events in the past: This incident is similar to past events related to campus openings at different universities. In the past, some colleges and universities have also caused controversy due to access control measures, and many colleges and universities are worried that the entry of people from outside the school will occupy school resources and affect the order and safety of teaching. However, some colleges and universities have begun to think about the openness of their campuses, realizing that openness is one of the hallmarks of modern university governance.
Impact on society: The incident sparked a lot of discussion and made people rethink the issue of openness on university campuses. On the one hand, the university campus is a public resource, which should conform to the principle of public resource utilization, and colleges and universities should assume the obligations and responsibilities of opening the campus. On the other hand, the openness of universities is also a consideration for modern governance and world competition. The incident has drawn attention to the openness of universities and prompted them to think about the importance of modern management measures and meeting public expectations.
Update on the incident: There is no update yet, however, the incident has attracted a lot of attention, and the issue of university openness may lead to more discussion and change.
Objective analysis of the impact of the incident: This incident has aroused social attention and discussion on the openness of university campuses, reflecting the close relationship between university openness and modern governance. The openness of university campuses is not only the obligation and responsibility of institutions of higher learning, but also an important symbol of the modern governance of universities. In a non-traditional way, the incident reminded universities that they should understand public expectations, examine modern management measures, and open their doors.
Add an element of interactivity: Do you think college campuses should be open to the public?Are there any restrictions on the openness of university campuses?Will the opening of the campus lead to teaching order and safety issues?Please share your views and opinions.