We need to understand the root causes of this conflict. Turkey has faced the threat of the Kurdish independence movement and the resulting terrorist activities since 1946. Over the past few decades, the PKK has become the dominant organization and has resorted to violence for independence or autonomy. Turkey has a different philosophy from Western countries when it comes to the pursuit of internal stability and the fight against terrorism.
Unraveling the hidden role of the United States in Turkey's conflict with the PKK. It was on the basis of disagreements about the terrorist threat that the United States began to intervene and support the Kurds. As one of the most important regional allies of the Islamic extremist group ISIS, the "huge" and slow Turkish army was not seen as a reliable partner in the fight against ISIS. On the contrary, the Kurdish armed forces have shown great strength and efficiency on the ground.
So the United States began to provide support to the Kurds, including a large amount of ** aid. The move sparked geopolitical games and led to tensions with Turkey. Turkey, for its part, considers the PKK to be a terrorist organization and complicates the situation by directly involving the United States in the conflict.
We cannot ignore the true intentions of those behind it. While the public statement is aimed at combating ISIS and protecting democratic values, there are deeper considerations behind it. It is very important for the United States to form its own circle of interests in the Middle East. The establishment of autonomous regions or independent states by supporting the Kurds means that a stable, controllable leader can be obtained in the region.
At a time when it is gradually competing with rivals such as Russia, the United States has expanded its sphere of influence by intervening in the conflict and firmly seized the initiative to speak in Middle East affairs. As a witness to and behind regional conflicts, the United States has maintained its indispensable position in Middle East affairs. This intervention has also sparked controversy.
On the one hand, balancing with allies such as Turkey is a great challenge. The United States needs to support the Kurds while maintaining relations with Turkey, which is a member of NATO and plays a vital role in the security situation in the region.
The Turkish army launched 71 airstrikes on northern Iraq and Syria and managed to capture dozens of PKK militants. This series of actions has put Turkey in the global spotlight and has also attracted a lot of attention from the international community.
As a country with great air power, the Turkish army has demonstrated perfect ground and air coordination. They precisely destroyed the PKK's senior leader, Sefa Ackerman, further weakening the group.
The war was a contest of military strategy, in which the Turkish army acted in a sophisticated and effective manner. They have won the victory with advanced technology, excellent conductors and excellent training, and they can play a shocking battle movement like a symphony.
After the ongoing hostilities with the Kurdistan Workers' Party, the Turkish army also recently launched an operation against the city of Sulaymaniyah.
This time, they succeeded in destroying the top leadership of the Kurdistan Workers' Party, further weakening the group's influence in the region. Turkey has always taken a firm stance on the Kurdish issue and sees it as a threat. A military strike may be only a short-term means to solve the problem. Achieving a long-term stable and peaceful settlement requires more in-depth dialogue and negotiation.
As the escalation of events attracted international attention, all parties began to call for a political solution to end the bloody battle. The international community should actively participate in and provide support, and play an active role in abiding by international law, protecting people's rights and interests, and promoting dialogue and cooperation between the two sides.
Erdogan** said in public: "We will mercilessly fight any terrorist organization that threatens the security of the country and the people." These bold statements demonstrate his resolute opposition to terrorism in all its forms and his willingness to take action to defend his country and its people. Such a tough stance is seen as heightened tensions in the region.
With Erdoğan** declaring that he will punish all forms of terrorism and carry out military action, the entire region is in a deeper and more complex predicament.
Although there are different opinions about the outcome of the current war, in any case, it will bring more instability to the region. In this situation, countries around the world have expressed different views on Turkey's actions.
Some countries support Turkey's fight against terrorist organizations and consider it necessary to protect their interests and maintain regional stability.
However, there are other countries that have expressed concern about Turkey's aggressive military action, which they fear will increase regional tensions and trigger a larger conflict.
From a neutral point of view, taking tough measures in the fight against terrorism can be understood as a move to ensure the safety of citizens and defend national interests. However, caution and wisdom are required in dealing with complex issues, and cooperation with relevant parties is sought to achieve long-term stability and sustainable development.