Recently, the Judgment Document Network released a precedent: in a silent mountain hut, the moonlight shines through the window on the two naked figures. This is not only the beginning of a transaction, but also a profound prologue about the boundaries of morality, law and humanity. How will this night be weighed on the scales of the law?
A man went down the mountain to the barber shop to find the ** woman, and said that he would take the girl to the mountain and have sex and give 400 yuan. After the two had sex, it was midnight, and the girl didn't dare to go down the mountain, so the two slept naked in a quilt. In the middle of the night, the man woke up and was about to have a sexual relationship again, the girl touched the man's lower body and said, "Are you okay?", the man said no problem, so the girl offered to give another 400 yuan, the man said that there was no money, the girl did not agree, and the man used violent means to force sex with the girl.
This case has sparked a lot of discussion. Some scholars believe that because of the woman's initial consent and the risk of self-involvement, a man's actions cannot constitute a ** crime. However, Professor Zhang Mingkai, a leading name in the legal field, put forward a different view. He stressed that the girl clearly objected, and she could not deny that the man's ** behavior constituted a crime just because she was a **woman, nor because she slept naked with the man** in the same quilt. Even if the victim is said to be self-responsible, at best, it can only be said that she needs to self-blame for some of her ** behaviors. For example, if a man wakes up in the middle of the night and touches her body, it cannot be found to be a compulsory ** crime. But for ** behavior, she should not be self-responsible. Of course, we can say that men have reduced the possibility of expectation, but we cannot say that there is no possibility of expectation.
In Western countries, especially in the United States, where feminism is under the influence of feminism, the law defines sexual consent more strictly. Any sexual activity without explicit consent is considered **. This is in stark contrast to the traditional Chinese concept of law.
This incident is not just a simple legal case, it touches on the deep issues of gender equality, abuse of power, and legal protection. In this case, we see the vulnerable position of women in the first trade and the challenges of the law in protecting vulnerable groups. Did you know?The topic of gender and power is actually everywhere in our lives, and as in this case, it is not just a news story, but deeply rooted in the daily lives of each of us.
In this case, we see a woman's helplessness and neglected rights. Her profession makes people dismiss what happened to her, as if her choices meant that she had to be treated in any way. But is it really fair?Could it be that a person's career and past choices determine what she should be treated with?
The law is the last line of defence for social justice. But in this case, we see the challenge of the law in the face of gender equality. In many cases, women's voices are ignored and their rights are denied. It's not just their problem, it's the problem of each and every one of us. Because whenever a person's rights are violated, justice and equality in our entire society are threatened. In this case, the man was sentenced for the crime of **.
This case also makes us think, what can we do as ordinary people?We can begin to listen, we can begin to understand, we can begin to respect everyone's choices and rights. We can promote gender equality and respect in our social circles, in our workplaces, and even in our families. Every small action is a step towards a better society.