Biden turned his face on important occasions and let his future be buried in Iran, which is too unwo

Mondo Social Updated on 2024-01-30

The latest conflict in the Gaza Strip has once again sparked worldwide opposition. Israeli indiscriminate bombardment of the Gaza Strip has reportedly resulted in a large number of civilians**, which has attracted great concern and condemnation from the international community. Against this backdrop, the General Assembly overwhelmingly adopted a ceasefire resolution calling on Israel to immediately cease its military operations.

However, the outcome of this ceasefire vote is more symbolic, as it reflects a strong global condemnation of Israel's actions. 153 countries voted in favour, 23 abstained and only 10 were against. Such a vote result undoubtedly sends a clear warning to Israel that their actions are no longer acceptable and supported by the international community.

In the wake of this conflict, Biden also harshly criticized Israel and addressed donors for 2024. This speech has aroused widespread attention and heated discussions.

In his speech, Biden said that Israel should not rely too much on the support of the United States, because they also have the support of other countries. However, as a result of their actions in the Gaza Strip, they have lost this support, and now only the United States is left to support them alone. Biden also stressed that Israel needs to change its policies and policies.

The criticism was made on an important occasion, at a Democratic donor conference. This makes the criticism all the more impactful, as the audience for this occasion is mostly Democratic patrons, many of whom are Jewish or pro-Israel. Biden's criticism is not only a condemnation of Israel, but also an explanation of his position and attitude to his financiers in order to win their support.

The relationship between Biden and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is already bad, and they have huge differences in political positions. Netanyahu is more supportive of Trump, while Biden is the opposite. Therefore, Biden has to support Israel, but at the same time to distance himself from Netanyahu.

Biden's speech shows his calculations and future considerations. While he condemns Israel, he sadds Netanyahu with more responsibility, while pushing him to change his policies in order to lessen criticism and condemnation of Israel. In this way, Biden is able to maintain a certain balance in front of the public and the financiers, not offending neither Jews nor Muslims.

After all, Biden's goal is to be re-elected, not to sacrifice his future for a ** who disagrees with his own politics. Therefore, in such a situation, he chose to criticize Israel on important occasions in order to make his attitude and position clear, and at the same time to consider his own future.

Against the backdrop of global concern and opposition to the conflict in Israel's Gaza Strip, Biden of the United States has harshly criticized Israel on important occasions. His criticism is not only directed at Israel's actions, but also at Israel** and Netanyahu.

Biden's criticism is both an appeal to Israel and an account to the international community, and he hopes that Israel will change its policies in order to win back the support of the international community. At the same time, he also thinks about his own political future, pleasing the Democratic party's patrons by criticizing Israel and avoiding conflict and controversy.

Although Biden's criticism is at risk, he has reserved a certain amount of political space for himself through clever expressions and occasion choices. However, for Israel, they now face global condemnation and isolation, and if they don't change, they will lose even more support and trust.

Finally, this incident also reminds us of the complexity of international relations and the game of interests in international politics. Each leader makes decisions under different interests and pressures, and these decisions have a direct impact on their own political prospects and the country's reputation. Therefore, when making decisions, it is necessary to comprehensively consider the interests and influences of all parties and make an informed choice based on the actual situation.

Related Pages