Recently, the news that Israeli intelligence services plan to hunt down Hamas leaders around the world has aroused widespread concern and concern. The plan, which is seen as an extension of Israel's covert operation after the end of the war in the Gaza Strip, also carries potential consequences and risks.
Israel has a long history of fighting terror, and the hunt for Hamas leaders is seen as a modus operandi of Israeli intelligence for years. However, there has been no shortage of failures and marginal results in Israel's assassination operations in the past. In 1997, Israel ordered the poisoning of Hamas leader Khaled al-Mashaal, but the operation failed completely, resulting in the release of Hamas's spiritual leader, Ahmad Yassin.
This time, Israel's targets are targeted in Lebanon, Turkey, Qatar and other places, which also means that the scope of Israel's "just war" has expanded to the international stage. However, it is still unknown whether such extreme measures will achieve the desired effect. On the one hand, Hamas's leaders are scattered across several countries, making it very difficult to organize operations and gather intelligence;On the other hand, Israel's actions are likely to trigger condemnation and condemnation from the international community, which in turn will affect Israel's international image and status.
Of course, Israel's initiative has also received support from some of the international community. These people believe that Hamas, as a terrorist organization, manipulates and intensifies the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, posing a great threat to peace and stability in the region. Therefore, the hunt for the Hamas leader can be seen as an act of self-defence by Israel to defend the security of the country and the lives and property of the people.
However, given the risks and uncertainties of the hunt and the likely more aggressive and hard-line replacement for Hamas's leader, this plan could spell new problems for Israel while solving the problem. Whether it continues to resort to extreme measures or to resolve disputes through dialogue and negotiation, Israel should carefully weigh the pros and cons of each option in order to achieve its long-term national interests.
What do you have to say about this event?Is Israel's plan just or violent?Everyone is welcome to like, comment and follow.
Note: **From the Internet, if there is any infringement, please contact to delete.