**: Fish Little Leap Fantasy Fan Bird.
Delaying retirement is for everyone, so why is it that only ordinary people are under so much pressure?
The recent news of delayed retirement has almost exploded, but although many people are concerned, he does not understand what this delayed retirement means.
What many people understand is that delaying retirement means that I have to work until I am 65 years old, ask for leave at the age of 65, and ask for instructions from my leaders.
There is a very famous stalk, that is, when I am 60 years old, I have to ask the leader to ask for leave.
Some people say that when I retired at the age of 65, my son and grandson were working, and three generations were working at the same time.
I have to say that this picture makes people feel a kind of humorous joke when they listen to it, but when you think about it, it really makes people think about it carefully.
The reality is not so frightening, a few very comfortable positions can allow you to work until the age of sixty-five, and other positions, you will lose your ability to work early.
At that time, you will not have to work, but not having to work does not mean that you can rest easy.
Delaying retirement until the age of 65 is actually making you receive your pension at the age of 65.
For example, if I lose my ability to work at the age of fifty-five, what will I live on for the remaining ten years?
This problem is left to oneself, either by relying on the children at home to support oneself, or by doing some work within one's capacity to support oneself.
I waited until I was 65 years old to receive the pension I was entitled to.
So I advise everyone not to hurt their bodies too much, everything is fake, everything is false, only the body is your own.
What are the benefits of doing so?Of course, there are great benefits, as for what the benefits are, I believe everyone can guess it, save money, and reduce pressure.
But have you ever thought that its shortcomings are terrible, not just terrible, already terrible to the extreme.
For example, have you ever thought that you can only receive money at the age of 65, so if the pension pressure continues to increase after 90 and 00, will the retirement time continue to be extended?Just like in Japan, retirement at the age of 70 or higher.
I think this kind of thing is very likely to happen, after all, the pension policy is unlikely to collapse, let alone as some netizens say, it will not be as unfinished as some netizens say, and it can only be constantly adjusted, and the so-called adjustment is to constantly compress expenses and constantly delay retirement.
But it is extremely unwise to reduce expenses by delaying retirement, and it is completely a drink to quench your thirst.
Many people say that the amount of pension is different, some people retire with a salary of tens of thousands, and some people only take a thousand yuan.
This inequality has also greatly discouraged people's motivation, for example, narrowing the gap between pensions and reducing expenditures.
However, this is more difficult to implement, after all, it touches the interests of some people.
One of the biggest consequences of this is that people will cut off pension insurance, and public officials will definitely have to pay if they can't do it, but those who are flexibly employed are estimated to be no longer willing to pay pension insurance.
Because they originally paid according to the lowest level, they couldn't get much money in the first place, and as a result, they had to delay their retirement.
In a word, the pension insurance has changed from the previous cost-effective to not cost-effective.
It's a vicious circle, where the birth rate decreases, the future pension will be smaller, and then it will continue to oppress that generation, and as long as the birth rate cannot be reversed, it will continue to go on and on.
It's terrible to think about, it's better to put all that money in the bank, deposit it in a pension of the same year, and use it in the end, I'm afraid it's more cost-effective than a pension.
More importantly, the previous generation exploited the people of this generation, and some people did not pay pensions at all, but enjoyed relative benefits.
On the contrary, this generation is plagued by pension problems.
Retirement at the age of sixty-five, many people may lose the ability to work at the age of fifty, what should these people do then?
Is it true that as others say, I went to work as a security guard and a cleaner, and worked hard until I was 65 years old to get a pension.
Hahahaha, I have to say, this is really an inexplicable irony.