On December 2, a shocking incident of vicious dogs injuring people occurred in Ji'an, Jiangxi Province. An 8-year-old boy was bitten by a large yellow dog, resulting in serious facial injuries and costly medical treatment. Despite the involvement, the identity of the dog owner remains mysterious, and what is the problem behind the injury?
In this tragedy, the focus is not only on the attack of vicious dogs, but also on people's perception of the responsibility of owning dogs. The problem of vicious dogs hurting people is essentially caused by the poor management of dog ownership and the lack of responsibility of human beings. It is deeply troubling that dog owners are always able to skillfully evade responsibility after a serious incident.
In the Ji'an incident in Jiangxi, the big yellow dog involved was killed by **. Although this is sometimes necessary, the identity of the dog owner becomes a problem for traceability. If the dog carries the owner's information, can the person responsible be found more quickly and avoid the tedious investigation and evidence collection process?Will technological advances be able to resolve this problem?
Compared with China, Germany has more detailed and targeted regulations when it comes to dog management. Dog owners are required to mark their name and address on their collars, and some cities even require the wearing of an identification chip. These measures not only facilitate the search for missing dogs, but also facilitate the identification of those responsible in the event of an incident. Can we draw inspiration from Germany's experience and improve the level of dog management in China?
Although "dog regulations" are generally enacted in various cities in China, many of the regulations are mere formalities due to problems at the implementation level. Although the prohibition of dog breeding and prohibited areas are stipulated, due to poor law enforcement, the phenomenon of illegal dog breeding has been repeatedly banned. After the incident of a vicious dog hurting people, it is even more difficult to find the dog owner.
With the rise of the dog ownership trend, we need to comprehensively rethink and update the dog ownership management system. Drawing on advanced foreign experience, can we work every dog wearing identity tags, immediate punishment if found not on a leash, and mandatory insurance purchase?Can such a system effectively reduce the occurrence of vicious dog injuries, so that dog owners have nowhere to escape?
In solving the problem of frequent incidents of vicious dogs hurting people, we need to realize that responsibility does not only belong to individual dog owners, but should also become a common responsibility of the whole society. The renewal of the system and the refinement of management are the key, and this is not only a restriction on dog owners, but also a guarantee of social security.
In terms of system updates, we can learn from Germany and other countries Xi require dog owners to mark their names and addresses on dog collars, wear identification chips, and pass exams to obtain a dog "license". Such regulations not only help to facilitate the finding of the owner of the missing dog, but also improve the sense of responsibility of the dog owner to a certain extent. At the same time, the compulsory purchase of insurance can be used to pay compensation in the event of a dog bite incident, so as to prevent the dog owner from evading prevarication afterwards. Such a comprehensive system not only protects the rights and interests of dog owners, but also ensures the rights and interests of victims.
The meticulousness of dog management also requires us to put more effort into the implementation level. In order to truly implement the "dog raising regulations" in place, it is not only a formal regulation, but also a practical and effective implementation. Establish an effective supervision mechanism, increase the punishment of illegal dog breeding, and deal with it in a timely manner once it is found without a leash, so as to effectively curb the occurrence of vicious dog injuries. Only by making substantial progress in the strictness of management can we get rid of the dilemma of dog management.
In this process, we need to understand that dog ownership is both a freedom and a responsibility. As a pet owner, in addition to enjoying the joy of being accompanied by a dog, you should also shoulder the responsibility of maintaining social safety. The strengthening of the regulation and management of the system is not an excessive restriction on dog owners, but to ensure the harmony and tranquility of the whole society while respecting dog owners.
All in all, to solve the problem of vicious dog injuries, it is necessary to start from the source, and build a social mechanism that not only protects the rights and interests of dog owners, but also ensures public safety through the renewal of the system and the refinement of management. Only in this way can we realize the ideal of harmony between humans and dogs, and make every dog ownership a beautiful and responsible experience. In this joint effort, we believe that no more innocent children will be injured by vicious dogs, and no more dog owners will evade responsibility because of invisibility. This is a goal that requires the joint efforts of everyone, and it is also a test of the degree of civilization of society.
Fierce dogs hurt people frequently, can we only protect ourselves?