The case occurred in Shanxi, where the young man had a relationship with the woman in the marriage room on the day of the wedding, and then was charged with ** and sentenced to 3 years in the first instance.
There are different opinions about this case. Especially when the woman received half of the bride price and urged the other half of the bride price, she was questioned by the fairy jump.
Subsequently, the court in question made public an article to set the record straight.
Reading this text carefully, I personally still believe that there is an important doubt in this case:
The court publicly stated that after the investigators examined the victim's body, the victim's left and right arms and right wrist were bruised. Can this determination prove that the man has violent ** behavior?Personally, I don't think so!Here's why:
First, according to the court's findings, sexual relations were first initiated, after which the woman ran out of the room to call for help and was forcibly dragged back to the room by the man. In other words, the bruises on the woman's left and right arms and right wrist may have been caused by dragging. This kind of injury cannot be used as direct evidence of **. In my opinion, the court should clearly and unambiguously determine that the injuries on the woman's body were caused by **. Otherwise, there is a suspicion of Zhang Guan and Li Dai.
Second, the court said that the circumstances of the two parties' negotiation of the bride price did not affect the determination of the crime of **. Then, I also want to say that the determination of ** crime requires a direct, complete, clear, and convincing chain of evidence. At present, neither the bruises on the woman's body, nor the act of burning the curtains and calling for help afterwards can prove that the sex itself was forced. Because, the bruise may be caused by dragging, and the curtain burning and calling for help may be staged. If you want to prove that this is a ** case against the will of a woman, it is very simple, and only by publicly inspecting the proof can it be truly convincing.
Third, the court said that the murdered woman was reported on the same day. Well, why don't you go and check it out?Such a simple logic, why didn't anyone arrange it?Afterwards, suspicious bruises, suspicious calls for help, and suspicious curtain burning were used to determine the ** crimeWhy are there so many suspicious additions?Because, the woman is a vested beneficiary, and she has already received half of the bride price. She can't completely rule out the motive of the fairy jump. In fact, reporting the case on the same day is very conducive to the conclusion of the case. It's a pity that there is no direct evidence, all indirect evidence with doubtful points, which is unconvincing.
In this case, there are actually two points of contention:
The first is whether the sex in the marital room constitutes **.
The second is whether the bride price and the sue ** constitute an immortal jump.
On the court's side, it is not impossible to completely bypass the woman's possible motives and sentence the man **. The problem is,This case has not been completed as an ironclad case, so it is difficult to avoid all kinds of associations. In my opinion, there is some room for manoeuvre for the defendant to appeal in court. It is hoped that the second instance can find a breakthrough in key evidence.