In response to the call of the masses, let's talk about Shanxi's "engagement case". (1) The first version that came out was this: The incident occurred in a small town in Shanxi, Yanggao County. It is said that at the end of January this year, the man and woman met through a marriage agency and established a romantic relationship. On May 1, the two held an engagement ceremony. Remember, just engagement, and no. 
First, I ate at the man's house, and the man gave the woman 100,000 dowry + 7A 2-gram ring. This is the same as the 18 that the man promised beforeThe bride price of 80,000 yuan seems to be a little different, but the problem is not big, and the two families got along happily that day. The next day, according to local customs, the woman's family also organized a "homecoming banquet" to invite the man's family. As a result, on this day, something big happened. After eating at noon, the man took the woman to the man's house, which was the marriage room where the two would get married in the future. It was an invitation for the purpose of visiting the wedding room, but in this situation, the man unilaterally felt that the atmosphere had been set in place, and it was time for his fiancée to learn his driving skills. What the man's driving skills are, outsiders don't know. What is certain is that the objective fact that he was driving without a license was formed!That's the trouble. 
The woman later raised a very serious topic: you have to add my name to the title deed. Add the woman's name to the real estate deed purchased by the man, which was verbally promised by the man during the relationship, but after one year of marriage. At this juncture, the woman reiterates this request, which can naturally be understood as that she can't wait!The man didn't agree, or he kept hesitating, so the woman was unhappy. So 4 days later, the woman called the police, saying that she was ** by the man. Case filing, evidence collection, arrest, criminal detention, and judgment. A dragon down, two days ago, the ending was:** The man was convicted and sentenced to 3 years in prison.
Netizens who watched this version all scolded the woman's femme fatale for using marriage as bait to fish for the house. What**?It is clearly a set set set up by her, and if the man agrees to add his name to the property right certificate, he is living a married life;If you don't add it, it's **. Isn't this blackmail?The one in prison should obviously be the woman.
The above version is mainly based on the material released by the man's family, and the effect is good, and many people cry out for the man. 
2) Now, with a completely different version, the source of information is the presiding judge of the court. The woman completely denied that she had put forward any conditions to the man after being **. In fact, at the beginning of her relationship with the man, she told the man that she resolutely resisted premarital sex!Therefore, when the man forcibly had sex with her against her will, despite her resistance, her emotions were very broken and out of control, and she even burned the curtains and wardrobes in the marriage room (where she was ** placed). also grabbed the door, took the stairs from the 14th floor where the man's house was located, escaped to the 13th floor, and shouted "help". was then forcibly dragged back to his home on the 14th floor by the man. These are all testified by the monitoring ** in the corridor. Moreover, after that, the man snatched her mobile phone for fear that she would call the police, and briefly controlled her personal freedom. It wasn't until the woman's mother called her that he returned the phone. As soon as she saw her mother, she cried about being ****. And most importantly,She didn't call the police 4 days later at all, but on the same night. The court sentenced the man to 3 years in prison on the basis that the engagement banquet is only a folk custom, and obtaining the certificate means that he has become a husband and wife, and the man's behavior is against the woman's will and meets the conditions for constituting the crime of **. You see, it's a mess. （3）
In fact, I think the presiding judge's explanation is not rigorous. It is easy to lead people astray and mistakenly think that there is a marriage certificate, this kind of thing is not **. Not true!Haven't you heard of "marital **"?A genuine couple, if the husband ignores his wife's emotional needs and forcibly overlies, the wife can also sue him. Of course, if this happens, my wife probably won't sue herEven if it is really sued, when it comes to law enforcement, it is definitely not as decisive as an ordinary ** case. What really excites me about this is:**After the incident, even the woman's relatives felt that it was inappropriate to make a public announcement, and still tried their best to promote this marriage. They even spontaneously communicated with the man's relatives, hoping to get married as soon as possible!They even think about the man's family in particular, it doesn't matter if the bride price is not a bride price, it is a serious thing to get married first to eliminate the influence. It's just that the woman was resolute and didn't listen to the opinions of her pig teammates. 
Many people think that this must be the man who spent money and hired these people as lobbyists.
But with my understanding of human nature, it's not necessarily. That said, I'm inclined to think,Even if they don't get the benefits, the woman's relatives will do such things. It's just that some logic has been passed down in their minds for thousands of years. For example, it's his people sooner or later, and it doesn't matter if you do it early or late;For example, this kind of ugly thing is not good for the woman, how can she marry in the future?
In short, they are also from the bottom of their hearts, using their "knowledge reserves" to "be good for the woman". As for the woman's dignity and principles, they don't care at all. They have always adhered to the principle of being a human being: if someone reasoned with me, I would follow morality. That's why I feel like the woman has done something of great significance:She is not fighting with a few relatives, but with the Great Wall of morality that has lasted for thousands of years. 
Sadly, it seems that she has won, but in life, she may still be ridiculed and even discriminated against by her relatives.
So, I'm writing this. I don't expect to change anything, just to simply record this unfortunate woman!100 help plan