Title:
Title: Revealed!Behind the Russia-Ukraine stalemate, why is the West "" support?Or become Putin's "dark" big winner?
At this time of change, the eyes of the world are once again focused on Eastern Europe, where the Russia-Ukraine war is intensifying, and the assistance of Western countries has become unpredictable. What's going on here?As a veteran blogger of military international relations, I will give you an in-depth analysis of the truth behind this wrestling.
Aid Declines: Why Are Europe and the United States Holding Still?
In the Russia-Ukraine war, Western countries have made it clear that they will not allow Putin to win, but military aid to Ukraine has been cut. This made me think deeply, why is he so hesitant to support Ukraine when he knows that Putin is invincible?The answer may lie in the game of international politics.
The cuts in aid to Ukraine by European and American countries have not only put Ukraine in a difficult situation, but also made the war situation develop in Putin's favor. Russia has shown firm military will in this process, while aid from European and American countries has not continued to grow, but has shown a downward trend. Is this a political calculation, or is it a deeper international game?That's where we need to dig deeper.
A dangerous trend: the tide of the war could turn in Putin's favor.
With the reduction of aid to Ukraine, the situation in the Russia-Ukraine war is gradually evolving in the direction of "Putin wins". The previously resolute stance of the West has gradually become vacillating, which makes Europeans restless. Ukraine, which lacks sufficient support, is in an increasingly dire situation in the face of Russia's challenge. This trend has raised fears of dangerous contagion in NATO countries, as Ukraine shares borders with several NATO countries and the fighting could spread to NATO territory.
A tense scene: Russian drones enter NATO airspace.
In this tense atmosphere, the incident of Russian drones entering NATO airspace has exacerbated the situation. In the new round of air strikes, the Russian army dispatched a large number of suicide drones, one of which deviated from the course and flew into Romanian airspace. This provoked a strong reaction from NATO, but in the face of a possible miscalculation, NATO did not give the order to shoot down. This shows NATO's hesitation on the issue of a direct conflict with Russia, and also reflects their fears of an escalation of the war.
Political calculations: Western politicians are reluctant to exchange fire in practice.
Some Western politicians have verbally shouted and shouted and claimed that "Putin will not be allowed to win", but in actual actions they have shown a posture of reluctance to directly exchange fire with Russia. German Chancellor Olaf Scholz has vowed to "reinforce Ukraine without hesitation", but whether this rhetoric can be put into practice is still an unsolved mystery. This phenomenon reveals the political calculations of some Western politicians, who prefer to maintain a long-term stalemate rather than a direct conflict by providing Ukraine with such means.
NATO's dilemma: not daring to risk a firefight with Russia.
In the event of the entry of Russian drones into NATO airspace, NATO showed its fear of a direct conflict with Russia. Despite the fact that in the face of a possible attack on a Russian drone against a NATO country, NATO did not shoot it down in the first place. This reaction reveals the dilemma of NATO, which does not dare to risk a firefight with Russia, fearing that a miscalculation could lead to the outbreak of a full-scale war. This view has gradually strengthened within NATO and has become a major constraint on its actions.
Aid becomes a bargaining chip: Aid is a favorable means of prolonging the war.
While avoiding a direct exchange of fire with Russia, European and American countries have skillfully continued the war by providing Ukraine with ** and other means. While some politicians pay lip service to their unwavering support for Ukraine, in reality they prefer to influence the war indirectly, maintaining a state that does not lead to direct conflict and continues to deplete Russia's potential. This makes aid a political and military bargaining chip, not only to save face, but also to meet the needs of some countries' interests.
Conclusion: The uncertainty and risk of the war situation.
Based on the above analysis, the current Russia-Ukraine war situation is at a stalemate, but it is facing many uncertainties and risks. While European and American countries emphasize that "Putin will not be allowed to win", their actual aid to Ukraine has decreased, resulting in the war situation may develop in Putin's favor. The entry of Russian drones into NATO airspace has heightened tensions and revealed NATO's hesitation on the issue of direct conflict. Western politicians pay lip service to shouting and killing, but they are unwilling to really risk fighting with Russia, and providing Ukraine with ** has become a favorable means to prolong the war. Against this complex backdrop, the future of the war situation remains uncertain and requires careful response by all parties to avoid the spread of the war and the risk of greater risk.