Two hot search topics are worth watching together: one is "wine and meat couple", and the other is "divorce and shooting".
"Wine and Meat Couple" is not difficult to understand literally, but this time, it is not just a matter of literal meaning, but also a criticism that directly pokes at human nature. The gist of it is that most couples seem to be intimate, but in fact they don't know each other at all, and they can't have more in-depth communication or even show each other their true selves except for eating, drinking, and instinctive intimacy together.
And "divorce follow-up", if you don't look closely at the news reports, it is easy to understand it as "looking for evidence for divorce". But in fact, "divorce and shooting" is a very "peaceful thing". The gist is that many young people no longer have bitterness and hatred when they divorce, but choose "divorce follow-up" and divorce parties. In the end, it is to carry out the sense of ritual to the end.
At this point, we can see that something is wrong. For the "wine and meat couple", the corresponding is naturally the "spiritual companion". But in fact, both in the past and in the present, materiality and romanticism have always been intertwined. So much so that whether it is Valentine's Day in the East or Valentine's Day in the West, on the whole, it is consumerist.
In other words, Romanticism is actually based on consumerism and materialism. Needless to say, this logic of reality is not new, but has long been rooted in the world. Therefore, when people look at the topic of "wine and meat couples", they are not unfamiliar at all. And what makes people feel "abnormal" is that most of the comment areas follow the ** emphasis and increase criticism.
When we say "abnormal" here, it's not that we think everyone's criticism is wrong, but as far as the real couples are concerned, maybe ten of them are "wine and meat couples", of course, the so-called "wine and meat" does not just refer to eating and drinking, having fun, and hugging, but compared with spiritual needs, instinct and material needs have a higher weight.
In addition to cultural influence, the main reason for this situation is that people are not only social people, but also animal people. When it comes to animal nature, it is difficult to avoid instinct and materiality. Therefore, even if the "spiritual couple" is worth looking forward to, the "wine and meat couple" is the norm.
Just as faced with the choice of marriage, women are married most of the time to material security, and even if they occasionally marry talents, they are talents that can make money. Emphasizing this reality is not against women marrying material security, but this has always been the choice of most people, and it is the standard of the colorful world.
The reason for the criticism of "wine and meat couples" probably can only show that this generation of young people is eager for "spiritual partners", but it does not mean that the model of "wine and meat couples" is absolutely rejected. After all, the mainstream is still the "wine and meat couple" is king. If you don't believe me, you can ask young people nowadays if they are all bent on making money, whether they are men or women.
Let's look at "Divorce and Shooting" again, * the narrative is actually very face-saving, and I think that this generation of young people is very advanced in their understanding of the separation of intimate relationships. But ask yourself, is this sense of ritual really necessary?Because traditionally speaking, the sense of ritual is mostly aimed at remembrance and joy, as for divorce, even if it is "unforgettable", most of the time people try to keep a low profile.
Because they will have a new life after that, if the separation is too public, it is easy to affect the "new beginning" of both parties. This simple truth must be easy to understand. In this case, the so-called "divorce and shooting are on fire" is more like reversing the basic disk of traffic. Because in the comment area under the topic, there is basically criticism, which is in stark contrast to the praise of **.
From this point of view, the criticism of "wine and meat couples" and the touting of "divorce and shooting", although they both point to the spiritual level of harmony and peace, but they are two opposite ways of harvesting traffic. The former is "those who follow me prosper", and the latter is "those who oppose me perish". As for the middle-of-the-road stance of "each according to his needs", it is not an option, naturally because it is "uncontroversial".
The reason why we say this is not that we are against controversy. It is better to be based on reality, rather than deliberately "increasing intensity" and "upside down" in order to follow or idealize something. Because the real reality will not be diverted from the real because of "upper strength" and "upside down". It will only be more unrecognizable because of "upper strength" and "upside down", and there is no discipline.