Hello everyone, I am learning from history. The Battle of Shangganling broke out in 1952, which was the most cruel and glorious battle to resist US aggression and aid Korea. In 3In an area of 7 square kilometers, 100,000 people fought for 43 days. But 70 years later, there are doubts: for this mountainous land, 1Is 1.56 million people worth it?
Actually should ask the United States: for 37 km², 2Is it worth it for 5.49 million people?
Political Motives: The Game of American Campaign Capital.
Why did the Americans risk 40% of the rate to attack Shangganling?Western military strategists believe that "war is the continuation of politics." The outbreak in Shangganling stemmed from political necessity.
First of all, the United States ushered in **, Truman's approval rating was low, and he abandoned the election. Unwilling to be defeated, the Democratic Party decided to gain political capital through war and launch a "showdown operation".
Second, the negotiations have reached an impasse, and the US side has won the advantage at the negotiating table. Harrison shouted, "Let the guns do the talking!"."The Americans are desperate to negotiate capital.
Third, geographical location determines the geographical location of the battle front. The Wusheng Mountain area has a good grasp of the situation on the Korean Peninsula, and the capture of Wusheng Mountain has a bearing on the entire war situation. The interweaving of campaigns, negotiations, and geographical advantages on the front line has made Shangganling a battlefield for political games.
The Battle Breaks Out: Political Capital and Big Gambles at the Negotiating Table.
On October 14, the Jinhua offensive began. The war situation is relatively stable, and the United States ** election campaign is white-hot. Truman had low approval ratings and gave up the election. Republican candidate Dwight D. Eisenhower vowed to end the war as soon as possible, and popular support swelled.
On November 4, polling day, the situation turned against Truman. As a result, the "showdown operation" was launched, and the capture of the mountain was political capital. The volunteers resisted valiantly, but the political game complicated the battle.
Political pressure and the cost of war: the smoke behind the election campaign.
The battle situation in Shangganling was difficult, and the volunteers resisted bravely. However, in the face of the news of the loss of Shangganling, Washington set off an uproar. November 4 is voting day, how can Americans give up the political benefits of this battlefield?
Beginning on 1 November, the United States mobilized troops, replenished new troops, and brought in rear troops, with more than 60,000 troops, to launch a frantic counterattack on Shangganling. The two sides fought to the death, and Shangganling became a battlefield of gunpowder under political pressure.
Decisive moment: political upheaval and final victory.
The two sides were locked in a white-hot battle, and the volunteers launched a decisive counterattack. The artillery and infantry of the Volunteer Army fought together to recover 5979 Heights. The situation of the war is not favorable for the "joint **", but the military is still a continuation of politics.
On November 16, the Associated Press announced that the coalition forces had been defeated at Shangganling. But Clark didn't give up and continued to send troops**. By November 25, when the war was halted by the Coalition, both Clark and Truman acknowledged that the defeat had dealt a heavy blow to the morale of the troops.
After Victory or Defeat: Political Speculation and Historical Reflection.
Although the victory in Shangganling brought political capital, the US military was heavy. Behind political speculation, there is a historical reflection. After the war, Truman abdicated and Eisenhower became **. The Battle of Shangganling was not only a military contest, but also a speculative battle of political conspiracy.
Seventy years later, when we look back at the Battle of Shangganling, we should ponder: Is the price of political speculation worth the heavy burden that history bears?War is a continuation of politics, but is it worth risking such a high price for political purposes?This is a question that deserves deep reflection.
The history of the Battle of Shangganling reveals the close relationship between war and politics, and the brutal reality that policymakers, driven by political interests, may sacrifice large numbers of innocent lives in pursuit of short-term political capital. The battle became a picture of political speculation, which is thought-provoking.
First of all, the article clearly pointed out that behind the outbreak of the Battle of Shangganling was the political pressure of the United States. Truman's support was low due to the defeat on the battlefield, and the Democrats were unwilling to accept defeat, so they sought political capital by waging war. This kind of political speculation makes one wonder whether politicians are pursuing the long-term interests of their countries or their own political careers when faced with difficult situations.
Secondly, the article mentions that the United States is waging war in order to gain an advantage at the negotiating table. This tactic of using force to gain an advantage at the negotiating table shows the interweaving of politics and the military, but it also raises questions about the wisdom of bloodshed to obtain negotiating capital. War should be a means of maintaining peace, not a bargaining chip.
Thirdly, the geopolitical perspective is also reflected in the article. The importance of the Wusheng Mountain region further complicates the whole situation. The battle for geographical advantages on the front line has made policymakers consider not only military victory or defeat at the strategic level, but also political and geopolitical factors. This makes one wonder whether the war was launched out of concern for *** or out of the political needs of individual decision-makers.
After the outbreak of the war, political pressure led the United States to invest more troops, and even if it lost on the battlefield, it continued to save face**. This shows that the power of politics is enormous in war, and even if the military situation is unfavorable, political decision-makers will continue to fight in order to maintain their prestige and position.
In the end, the victory or defeat of the Battle of Shangganling was ultimately swayed by political speculation. This situation caused me to reflect on political decision-making. Are tens of thousands of civilians and soldiers being taken into account while policymakers pursue political interests?Is the price of war worth paying for a momentary political victory?
On the whole, the historical lessons of the Battle of Shangganling tell us that politics and war are inseparable, but policymakers need to find a balance between weighing political interests and the safety of people's lives. The cost of war is heavy, and the cost of political speculation is immeasurable. We should learn from history and reflect deeply on this period of history in order to avoid the recurrence of similar tragedies caused by political speculation.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!