I joined the work in 1985 and successively served as the secretary of the ** office, the propaganda officer, and the director of the radio and television management station. In 2002, in response to the state's call for the reform of public institutions, he took the initiative to leave his post without pay to work in the sea, and successively served as deputy general manager and general manager of a private enterprise. In 2018, he founded a film and television media company. When I reached the age of 60 and went through the retirement procedures, the people from the Social Security Bureau told me that I could only retire as a flexible employee, and the retirement fee was only 965 yuan per month.
I smiled wryly and shook my head, the previous excitement was swept away, and I thought that I could only stop here, how could I fight against the officials if I was a pariah alone?Anyway, it's not bad for that little money to retire.
But looking back and thinking about the reasons given to me by the Social Security Bureau, I was puzzled. I believe that many of the veteran comrades who have come after me have had similar experiences as me. The reason given to me by the Social Security Bureau is that because you can't find the record of the employer's insurance payment for you in your past recruitment and work files, you can only enjoy flexible employment and retirement benefits!There are a few questions that make people puzzled:
1. When public institutions were reformed in those years, those who were able to find jobs on their own, those who did not have enough education were laid off to study and Xi, and those who were old were encouraged to retire early. Is it wrong for me to take a leave of absence without pay and find a job to find my own job?
2. I am self-employed and rely on my ability to let the company pay employee pension insurance for me, without taking a penny from the unit, what is wrong with reducing the financial burden of the unit and the state?
3. The past work experience is documented in the unit and the Social Security Bureau, and the evidence is conclusive, just because there is no unit payment record, the historical length of service that exists is completely denied
I haven't found the relevant national policies for the above situation, and netizens who know the situation can help provide it. If there is such a policy, I think such a policy is not in line with emotion, reason, and law, because the root cause of the above problems is not us personally, so why should individuals bear it?What is the reason of heaven?What is the legal principle?