Introduction: Recently, a heated exchange of rhetoric broke out between Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Turkey** Erdogan, with both sides attacking each other as "more vicious than Hitler", which has attracted widespread attention. This is not only a reflection of the personal feud between the leaders of the two countries, but also a manifestation of the increasingly fierce geopolitical hostilities in the Middle East. As Chinese, we should keep a clear and rational mind, neither blindly stand in line, nor make conclusions easily. Only by getting rid of prejudice and objectively analyzing the facts can we find the correct direction for resolving contradictions. First of all, let's take a look at the before and after of this "war of words". At an awards ceremony in Ankara last week, Erdogan first accused Israel of being "more cruel than the Nazis" in Gaza, and then called "Netanyahu more vicious than Hitler." In response, Netanyahu called Erdogan a "genocidaire of the Kurds" and said that the Israeli army is "the most moral army in the world." After that, the two sides continued to pinch each other word by word.
On the surface, this is just a radical remark by the leaders of the two countries who do not hesitate to say anything at the moment. But if you look at it in the broader context, it is not difficult to see something deeper: First, it highlights the differences between Turkey and Israel on the Palestinian question. Turkey has consistently supported Palestine and criticized Israeli military strikes in Gaza;Israel, on the other hand, sees this as a legitimate counterattack to the terrorist organization Hamas. Second, it also reflects the differences between the two countries on how to view historical issues, with Erdogan satirizing Netanyahu as "ungrateful" and Netanyahu accusing Erdogan of hypocrisy. Finally, such a controversy will undoubtedly exacerbate tensions in the Middle East and further sharpen the contradictions between the parties. This article will conduct an in-depth analysis of the beginning and end of this war of words and its impact, strive to be objective and rational, and provide some thoughts for resolving the long-standing fundamental contradictions in the Middle East.
1. The cause of the dispute: Erdogan first "opened fire" and lit the fuse of the polemic Last Thursday, Turkey's ** Erdogan delivered a speech at an award ceremony in Ankara, which first ignited the flames of this ** war. In his speech, he accused Israel's actions in Gaza of being "more cruel than the Nazis" and said that "Israel has built concentration camps," and these statements immediately caused waves inside and outside Turkey.
According to reports, Erdogan specifically said the following: 1. Israel has set up "concentration camps" in Gaza, using the same methods as the Nazi concentration camps for Jews;
4。Israel has received strong support from Western countries, especially the United States, so that it can do all kinds of evil. Erdogan's remarks are undoubtedly a harsh accusation and warning to Israel, and this is the first time among Turkey's top leaders. According to external analysis, the reasons behind it are as follows:
1。Erdogan has always been biased towards the Palestinian position and has long opposed Israel's colonization activities in Palestinian territory 2。The recent Israeli army's attack on Gaza has caused a large number of civilians**, which has caused strong dissatisfaction on the Turkish side
3。Relations between Turkey and Israel are already strained, and Erdogan intends to put further pressure on Israel. 4。Erdoğan may have political considerations to improve his personal and political profile.
Whatever the reason, Erdogan's remarks undoubtedly threw a resounding slap in the face to Israel and ignited this vigorous war of words. 2. Netanyahu responds: Erdogan is the genocidaire of the Kurds.
Erdoğan's remarks immediately drew a response from Israel, especially Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. In an official statement, he said:1. Erdogan is the least qualified to blame Israel;
2。Erdogan is committing genocide against the Kurds inside Turkey; 3。The IDF is the most moral army in the world and is fighting the cruel Hamas***
4。Erdoğan, however, is supporting and hosting organizations such as Hamas. It can be seen from Netanyahu's remarks that he has completely adopted a strategy of counter-attack and counter-accusations, mainly with the following intentions:
1。Beat a rake, and ridicule Erdogan on charges of genocide and other crimes; 2。Justify the Israeli army, calling it "the most moral army in the world";
3。Characterizing Hamas as a terrorist organization rationalizes the crackdown; 4。Accusing Erdogan himself of having Nazi tendencies.
Such a counterattack undoubtedly pushed the debate to a climax, and also showed the outside world the tough side of Israel. Third, the war of words has highlighted the fundamental antagonism in the Middle East and made the situation even worse.
The war of words between Erdogan and Netanyahu seems to be just a verbal wrestling, but in fact it reflects and highlights the fundamental contradictions and antagonisms in the Middle East, and these differences of opinion make the situation even worse: 1. The Palestinian-Israeli contradictions are becoming more and more acute. The mainstream public opinion of the Turkish representative is biased in favor of the Palestinian side, which has increased the diplomatic pressure on Israel.
2。The values of the two countries on international issues are rapidly diverging, and it is difficult to find common ground. 3。The outcome of the controversy will increase tensions and further stir up public sentiment.
4。More countries are likely to get involved, forming different "spit camps". 5。The Middle East peace process is facing a new round of blows, and regional chaos is likely to continue.
This seemingly small-scale war of words is enough to reflect the rapid deterioration of the situation in the Middle East. There are all kinds of indications that if the parties continue to engage in such-for-tat, it cannot be ruled out that the situation will evolve towards the worse side. Fourth, resolving confrontation requires mutual understanding and accommodation, and China can play a constructive role.
In view of the complexity and sensitivity of the current situation in the Middle East, the following efforts are needed to resolve the antagonism and contradictions between all parties and achieve peace and stability: 1. All parties to the dispute need to exercise rational restraint and refrain from reckless and radical actions
2。It is difficult to resolve fundamental contradictions based on dialogue rather than confrontation; 3。All parties involved need to make some [gf]fffd[gf] concession to achieve reciprocity;
4。The international community can play a constructive role, not choose sides. As a country that has experienced war, China should exert its unique influence to persuade all parties to exercise restraint and rationality and return to the negotiating table, which is not only conducive to the Middle East, but also to world peace and development. We deserve to work for it!
By interpreting the ins and outs of this rhetoric storm, this article analyzes the fundamental antagonism of the geopolitics in the Middle East as reflected in it, and calls on all parties to remain rational and resolve differences through dialogue. China should also play a constructive role. This kind of wisdom of major powers that objectively analyze problems and resolve differences through rational dialogue will be conducive to the realization of peace in the Middle East, which has been plagued by war for a long time in the region. This article only represents the author's personal views, and we sincerely ask readers from all parties to correct the deficiencies. Thanks for reading!Question guidance: This vigorous war of words in the Middle East reflects the complexity of the situation in the Middle East. What do you think the current situation will turn out of?What role can China play?Welcome to leave a message to discuss.