Most of the assessment methods we are exposed to in public *** are structured interviews. But in addition, the interview format of leaderless group discussion is also more common, especially in bank interviews and recruitment interviews. Next, let's take a look at the leaderless group discussion interview.
There are no leadership group scoring rules
The scores of leaderless group interviews are generally not too low, and the average score is above 70. It will examine everyone's comprehensive analysis skills, organizational communication skills, interpersonal interaction skills, verbal expression skills, behaviors and manners. It is important to note that in leaderless group interviews, the scores of the individual and the group are equally important.
There is no leaderless group interview format
The time is generally about 30 minutes, which is different from the structured interview, which is a group interview, and the answers are answered in the form of discussion. It is divided into four parts: understanding the test questions - personal statement - free discussion - concluding arguments. Then the examiner will score each person according to their performance, usually a question, but there will still be differences in different positions, and everyone should grasp the main points when answering the questions.
Leaderless group interview is difficult
The difficulty of a leaderless group lies in free discussion, and too much or too little talk is a minus. In our speeches, we must be positive but not too impatient;Be careful about teamwork, you can play a leadership role, but not too strong;Grasp the key to the problem, be concise and to the point, and make your speech persuasive.
No matter what form of interview, you need to practice a lot of Xi, and it is best to find some classmates who are also preparing for the exam and practice with each other, so as to find your weak points and strengthen your language skills. Learning interviews can not only stay in theory, but also practical exercises can be effectively improved.