Body:
In recent years, the topic of food delivery for college graduates has aroused widespread concern in society. Some people believe that college graduates are "going to college" for nothing, wasting educational resourcesOthers believe that it is a manifestation of diversified development that meets the needs of the times. So, is the delivery of food by college graduates a "white" university or diversified development?
First of all, we cannot deny that university education is a valuable resource, which is not only the imparting of knowledge, but also the cultivation of comprehensive quality. Therefore, for most families, sending their children to college is in the hope that they will have better opportunities for development. However, we cannot ignore the fact that the current social and economic development is rapid, the market demand is ever-changing, and the traditional concept of employment has been difficult to adapt to this change. In this case, some college graduates choose a career such as food delivery, perhaps not because they don't have a better choice, but because they are trying to adapt to the market demand and look for more employment opportunities.
Second, we can't simply equate a college graduate's career choice with a "white" university. After all, a person's career choice is influenced by a variety of factors, including personal interests, abilities, market needs, and more. If a college graduate chooses food delivery because he has a strong interest in the industry or he thinks the industry has great prospects for development, then how can we say that he "went to college" for nothingIn addition, even if a college graduate's career choice seems to be inconsistent with his major, it does not mean that his college education is wasted. Because in the four years of college, what he has learned is not only professional knowledge, but also a kind of comprehensive quality improvement and accumulation of life experience.
Of course, we can't ignore the possible problems of food delivery for college graduates. On the one hand, if a large number of college graduates choose to pursue such seemingly simple careers, it may raise questions about the quality of university educationOn the other hand, if college graduates pursue short-term interests too much when choosing a career, and ignore their own long-term development, it may have a negative impact on their career planning. Therefore, we can neither simply criticize nor blindly encourage the phenomenon of food delivery by college graduates. We should look at this issue from multiple perspectives and encourage college students to rationally choose their career development direction according to their actual situation and market demand.
In short, for the phenomenon of college graduates delivering food, we cannot simply use the "white" university to evaluate. We should respect everyone's career choices and encourage college students to plan their careers rationally. At the same time, we should also strengthen the guidance and help for college students' employment, improve their employment competitiveness, and provide more support for their future development. Only in this way can we truly realize the diversified development of talents and promote the progress and prosperity of society.