Mao Zedong went beyond history to interpret the real reasons for the failure of Zhuge Liang s Northe

Mondo History Updated on 2024-01-29

As prominent politicians and military strategists in Chinese history, the evaluation of historical figures often focuses on the political and military aspects. In his eyes, Zhuge Liang is a highly regarded historical figure. In his early years of study, ** had a deep respect for Zhuge Liang, and after reading Zhuge Liang's two "Teacher Tables", he taught by words and deeds: "I also want to do my best, just after death!."”

** Not only admires Zhuge Liang's character, but also appreciates his outstanding talent. In 1953, a controversy over the handling of the female bandit Shou Cheng Lianzhen attracted the attention of ***. Cheng Lianzhen was once named the head of the regiment by the Kuomintang, but on the issue of how to deal with her, ** proposed a way of leniency, expressing a high degree of recognition for Zhuge Liang's art of handling ethnic relations.

In the opinion of ***, "seven captures and seven verticals" is an excellent way to deal with ***. This philosophy has been embodied in the handling of Cheng Lianzhen's case. Although there were differences of opinion, ** insisted on not killing Cheng Lianzhen, and finally through her release, the persuasion of the bandits and the propaganda of the national policy were realized, showing the broad-mindedness that transcended the traditional concept.

On March 20, 1964, ** emphasized the promotion of young cadres, taking Zhuge Liang as an example, highlighting the examples of young people repeatedly holding important positions in history. ** Citing the example of the Battle of Chibi, he compared Zhuge Liang's 27-year-old fame with the potential of modern young people, and put forward clear requirements for the training of young cadres.

However, in the evaluation of Zhuge Liang, ** did not blindly praise, he criticized the failure of Zhuge Liang's Northern Expedition. Regarding the reasons for the failure of Zhuge Liang's Northern Expedition, ** put forward unique views. He believes that Zhuge Liang made a strategic mistake in "Longzhong Pair"**, scattering his troops in Jingzhou and Yizhou, thousands of miles away, resulting in a weakening of the military and ultimately unable to succeed in the Northern Expedition. ** This view highlights the emphasis on the concentrated use of forces, emphasizing the military principle of "concentrating superior forces and annihilating the enemy individually."

**The analysis of Zhuge Liang's loss of the street pavilion is even more in-depth. In the defeat of Jieting, ** believed that Zhuge Liang's strategic mistake was that he did not personally go to the front line to command, but set up a headquarters far away in the Qilian Mountains. In contrast, Sima Yi's personal command and investigation were successful. **In this regard, it is proposed: "Watching people and viewing the big festival, slightly small, slightly small." He believed that Zhuge Liang's mistake lay in his neglect of the overall situation, while Sima Yi observed the overall situation with a higher strategic vision and successfully defeated the Shu army.

**The evaluation of historical figures is not only the absorption of successful experience, but also the profound interpretation of practical problems in the context of the times. His guiding ideology not only transcends the viewpoints of his predecessors, but also does not fall into a stereotypical pattern, and always maintains a deep reflection on history. **Through the evaluation of Zhuge Liang, the Chinese Communists should be guided to have a broader mind and a greater courage to achieve transcendence of history.

In the eyes of ***, Zhuge Liang is a respectable but flawed historical figure. Through his meticulous interpretation of Zhuge Liang, he put forward clearer requirements for the leading cadres of the Communist Party of China, which not only drew on historical experience, but also transcended traditional concepts, and provided useful inspiration for the decision-making of contemporary Chinese leaders.

This article takes Zhuge Liang's evaluation as the main line, deeply analyzes China's views on historical figures and their deeds, and shows China's unique insights on military, politics, and talent training. Through detailed historical materials and quotations, the author presents readers with the praise and criticism of Zhuge Liang, as well as his profound military wisdom and leadership philosophy.

First of all, the article reveals the special reverence for Zhuge Liang from the perspective of ***'s evaluation of historical figures. ** Not only did he deeply admire Zhuge Liang in his early years, but he also regarded him as an outstanding politician and military strategist. This worship stems not only from Zhuge Liang's character, but also from his appreciation for his exceptional talent. Through the mouth of ***, readers can feel Zhuge Liang's unique position in Chinese history, as well as his unique vision for historical figures.

Secondly, the article highlights the broad-mindedness and unique insights in handling ethnic relations. Through the case of Cheng Lianzhen, the author vividly demonstrates the support for the "seven captures and seven verticals" strategy, and compares it with Zhuge Liang's wisdom in handling ethnic relations. **'s instructions not only reflect his deep insight into human nature, but also reflect the leadership style that transcends tradition and is lenient and open-minded in dealing with contradictions. This recognition of the wisdom of historical figures makes the leadership style of *** even more remarkable.

The article further explains the promotion of young cadres and the deep insights into the reasons for Zhuge Liang's failure. ** On several occasions, the holding of important positions by young people was mentioned, and Zhuge Liang was used as an example to highlight the potential and role of young people. This encouragement and trust in young people injected fresh blood into the revolutionary cause at that time. As for the reasons for the failure of Zhuge Liang's Northern Expedition, **'s interpretation is different from the general view, highlighting his insistence on the concentrated use of forces and his understanding of military principles.

Finally, through an in-depth analysis of the battle of the lost street pavilion, the article shows the unique insight of the first strategic mistake. ** believes that Zhuge Liang's mistake lies in not personally going to the front line to command, and lacks in-depth insight into the overall situation. Although this criticism is direct, it reflects the harsh standards of responsibility and decision-making that leaders should have. Through this example, his transcendent thinking about historical figures is further demonstrated, providing profound teachings for later leaders.

On the whole, this article shows the unique wisdom of the leadership and the deep insights into historical figures through an in-depth interpretation of Zhuge Liang's evaluation. Through the analysis of historical stories, readers can better understand the leadership style and military philosophy, and at the same time, they can also learn some experience and enlightenment from the leadership Xi.

Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.

If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!

Related Pages