Nowadays, traffic accidents have become a major hidden danger in our daily lives, whether it is a collision between vehicles, a collision between a vehicle and a building, or a collision between a vehicle and a pedestrian that causes the most serious injury, we must strictly follow the traffic rules and remain cautious.
Especially in places with harsh climates and complex environments, it is necessary to be more vigilant. However, we may not know much about traffic accidents that do not involve direct contact.
Recently, a jaw-dropping traffic accident occurred in Anhui Province, Hefei City, which attracted widespread attention. What is special about this accident is that the owner of the car who was driving normally and supporting the elderly man was eventually told that he was secondarily responsible.
As soon as this news was posted on the Internet, it immediately caused an uproar. Many netizens have "hugged grievances" for the car owner, and some people even left a message saying: "I just bought a battery car and am ready to go to Hefei to start a business." ”
Let's find out what kind of traffic accident happened that caused such a sensation on the Internet!
Regarding this "outrageous" traffic accident, we must first understand the traffic rules, which are the basic knowledge we learn from kindergarten, involving aspects such as "driving on the right, not driving in the wrong direction, not speeding, and wearing a helmet".
In this accident, the owner of a black SUV made a normal right turn at an intersection without the slightest violation. However, in the process of turning right, an elderly man rode a battery car "in the wrong direction, speeding, and without a helmet" to meet him, and eventually fell far away from the owner.
More often than not, most people may choose to move on in order to avoid trouble. However, the SUV owner got out of the car and observed the old man's injuries with concern. It was originally an act of kindness, but it unexpectedly caused trouble for itself.
It turned out that this was an incident involving "whether to help or not", and the old man underwent surgery afterwards**, but he put the blame on the helpful SUV owner.
In today's society, traffic accidents have become a major hidden danger in our lives, whether it is a collision between vehicles, a collision between a vehicle and a building, or a collision between a vehicle and a person that causes the most serious injury to pedestrians, we must obey the traffic rules and travel cautiously.
Especially in places with harsh climates and complex environments, it is necessary to be more careful. However, we may not know much about traffic accidents that do not involve direct contact.
Recently, a ridiculous traffic accident occurred in Anhui Province, Hefei City, which attracted widespread attention. What is special about this accident is that the owner of a car who was driving normally and supporting the elderly man was eventually told to take secondary responsibility.
As soon as this news was posted on the Internet, it immediately caused an uproar. Many netizens have "hugged grievances" for the car owner, and some people even left a message saying: "I just bought a battery car and am ready to go to Hefei to start a business." ”
Let's find out what kind of traffic accident happened that caused such a sensation on the Internet!
Regarding this "outrageous" traffic accident, we must first understand the traffic rules, which are the basic knowledge we learn from kindergarten, involving aspects such as "driving on the right, not driving in the wrong direction, not speeding, and wearing a helmet".
In this accident, the owner of a black SUV made a normal right turn at an intersection without the slightest violation. However, in the process of turning right, an elderly man rode a battery car "in the wrong direction, speeding, and without a helmet" to meet him, and eventually fell far away from the owner.
More often than not, most people may choose to move on in order to avoid trouble. However, the SUV owner got out of the car and observed the old man's injuries with concern. It was originally an act of kindness, but it unexpectedly caused trouble for itself.
It turned out that this was an incident involving "whether to help or not", and the old man underwent surgery afterwards**, but he put the blame on the helpful SUV owner.
The old man's family asked the owner to bear the main responsibility for the accident, but for the owner of the car, he obviously didn't plan to get used to such a "slanderous" behavior.
After all, both the dash cam and the monitoring of the intersection at that time clearly recorded the beginning and end of the accident, so in the end, the two sides broke up unhappily, and finally began to try under the coordination of the police.
I thought that this farce would undoubtedly end with the owner not being responsible, and even said that the elderly family would be punished for such behavior, but I didn't expect the result to be the opposite.
As the traffic accident continued, Ms. Chen, the mother of the SUV owner, uploaded the incident online. With the fermentation of the incident, the traffic police officers said that the identification of the traffic accident does not have to have substantial contact, and the specific details of the accident should not be disclosed because it involves sensitive information.
Regarding this "contactless accident identification", many netizens expressed their incomprehension, and various yin and yang weird remarks emerged in the comment area, and many people complained for SUV owners.
Some netizens left messages expressing their concerns about driving in other places, some said: "I fell down while riding a battery car in Guangdong", "What should I pay attention to when driving an SUV locally", "I dare not turn right in Inner Mongolia". Some people even said that this was "fueling the arrogance of porcelain".
It is reported that the owner of the car, who is the protagonist of the accident, has now accepted the responsibility determination, saying that he does not want to solve the problem over and over again. Although the determination of liability has been determined, the owner of the car is not actually responsible for it, because the insurance company has already taken over the handling of the accident. However, this result did not quell the dissatisfaction of netizens.
This incident has caused an uproar on the Internet, and the official account of ** has also been occupied by netizens' unfair remarks. The entire social network is filled with doubts about the identification of this "contactless" accident and doubts about the handling of **.
Some netizens who are familiar with the relevant penalty standards have dug up the possible basis for the judgment. According to Article 76 of the Road Traffic Safety Law, if there is evidence to prove that a non-motor vehicle or pedestrian is at fault, the liability of the motor vehicle can be reduced. If the motor vehicle party is not at fault, it only needs to bear no more than 10% of the liability at most.
From the perspective of laws and regulations, this sentence has a certain basis. Some rational netizens said that such a standard of punishment is actually protecting the vulnerable.
In traffic accidents, non-motorized vehicles and pedestrians are in vulnerable groups, and such a penalty standard can encourage motor vehicle owners to pay more attention to driving safety, and also help to protect the lives of vulnerable groups.
Cars are insured, while non-motorized vehicles and pedestrians are not. If the driver of a motor vehicle is not in awe of the sudden traffic safety problem, it is very detrimental to people's safety if they do not pay attention to the violation of pedestrians and non-motor vehicles just because they have not violated the law.
In fact, in real life, even if a traffic accident is caused by a pedestrian or non-motor vehicle violation, the motor vehicle will eventually bear some responsibility.
However, some netizens expressed their understanding of the punishment for this incident, but some people thought that such a penalty standard was unfair to the driver. The main reason is that this penalty makes the driver not only morally responsible, but also legally responsible. Although the penalty result has been determined, many netizens still expressed doubts about it.
Some netizens raised some important questions, one of the most serious of which is: what action should the driver take in this situation to avoid being held responsible?If the driver does not get out of the car to help, will it be considered a hit-and-run, or is it not related to him?
Even some netizens expressed some alternative opinions, questioning whether this would boost the arrogance of some lawbreakers such as "** slander".
In China, there are some lawbreakers who will do whatever it takes to get rich quickly. One way to do this is to engage in the so-called "porcelain touching" behavior. This type of person will usually be in an unmonitored place, pretending to collide with some vehicle that is driving too fast or violating the law. These people tend to opt for more expensive vehicles because these owners often choose to pay money to solve the problem in order to avoid trouble. This is known as "touching porcelain" and is a simple and efficient way to make money, which has attracted countless followers in China.
There is also a situation that mainly occurs in the elderly, involving the problem of "whether to help or not to help". In China, this kind of incident often happens, that is, someone acts bravely, but in the end is falsely accused by the old man and pays a large amount of medical expenses.
The accident has sparked conflicting thinking about the balance between righteousness and legal responsibility. An incident that once took place in our country is deeply contradictory. A young man saw an injured old man and helped him up, but was eventually falsely accused by the old man and his family.
In the courtroom, the judge actually said a deeply chilling sentence: "If you didn't hit it, why did you help it?"This remark caused an uproar at the time, causing people to fall into deep doubt about their own helpful behavior.
But as sons and daughters of China, we have been taught that it is contrary to our traditional virtues to be indifferent to death. What a terrible sight it would be if society did not have love. Although this phrase affects us to be helpful, it is not our fault that we are helpful, it is what our traditional virtues affect us.
However, it is still a matter of deliberation whether we will help in reality without hesitation in the case of an elderly man falling, and whether we will worry about falling into the story of the "farmer and the snake".
The concerns of netizens are not unreasonable, such a penalty may encourage the arrogance of non-motorized vehicles. In fact, we can often find on the road that the most disobedient traffic rules are often non-motorized vehicles. Behaviors such as driving in the wrong direction, taking people, not wearing helmets, speeding, and running red lights abound, which have great hidden dangers to traffic safety.
In this accident, the old man's behavior basically violated the traffic rules, and the owner did not choose to ignore it, but immediately stopped to check the injury. Such a gap makes netizens feel unacceptable.
In reality, it is really difficult to achieve perfect traffic safety. There is also a law to follow in this sentence, and we should believe that all this is for the benefit of everyone.
Through this accident, we must always pay attention to our safety in our daily lives, whether we are driving or cycling. Don't ignore traffic rules because you're in a hurry and want to save trouble. Once an accident happens, it's too late to regret it. Especially in the cold winter, you should be extra careful where the road surface is icy. Life safety is greater than the sky, and we must not take it lightly.