The call for the abolition of village cadres is rising, and the peasants are calling for their abolition
The current situation of the village committee and the voice of the peasants.
In the rural areas, more and more peasants are demanding that village cadres be dismissed. They believe that the village cadres do not have much practical effect on the village, and there is not much that they can do. Instead of paying them a monthly salary, it would be better to simply remove them from their positions. So, what is the reason for the dissatisfaction of the peasants with the village cadres today?There must be a reason. When one or two peasants have a conflict with a village cadre, the removal of the village cadre from his post will be regarded as a personal problem of the peasant.
However, if the majority of peasants demand that village cadres be removed from their posts, the first department must re-examine whether the current village cadres still have a role in the rural areas. At present, village cadres are just a job, there is no altruism, and their functions are gradually weakened. The impression of the village cadres is the same"Post-80s"、"Post-90s"of young farmers are very different. In the impression of the younger generation, village cadres have a leading role, especially during the period of the People's Commune. On behalf of the village collective and the villagers, they can be said to do their best and take the affairs of the collective as their own.
This sense of responsibility is incomparable to the current village cadres. At present, it is very difficult to find village cadres to do things, and even if they do things, they can't help much. For example, village cadres can no longer be found to deal with the problems of old-age pensions, the approval of rural homesteads, the problems of subsistence households, and the problems of land distribution. Their work is limited to mechanical loading and unloading, and when farmers become more smartphone-friendly, these jobs can be done directly by the local **. In addition, agricultural subsidies used to be distributed to the villages, and then to the peasant households by the village cadres. The current practice is for the municipal finance bureau to distribute directly to farmers.
As a result, the work of village cadres has been greatly reduced. In addition, there is still a serious problem among village cadres at present, that is, they are unable to lead the peasants to become rich. First of all, there are limited capabilities. Most of the village cadres are on the older side, lack knowledge reserves, and do not understand the market, so it is difficult for them to lead the peasants to become rich. However, they are adept at taking advantage of their position to pursue their own interests. In rural areas, many village cadres drive small cars, live in villas, and even own large tracts of land, even though their farming skills are not as good as those of farmers. All this is because they take advantage of their positions, embezzle collective resources, and make a fortune. Therefore, it is very necessary to remove village cadres from their posts. At the same time, many peasants now choose to work in the cities because in reality it is very difficult for peasants to make a fortune on the farmland in their hometowns, and village cadres do not play any role in the management of farmland. So do you agree to remove the village cadres from their posts?
Peasants called for the abolition of village council positions.
1.The role of village cadres is getting smaller and smaller.
With the evolution of rural development, the role of village cadres has gradually weakened. Village cadres were originally a job in the village, but now in the eyes of the peasants, village cadres no longer have a practical role. They lack the motivation to work for the welfare of the villagers, and there is not much they can do for the farmers. The major affairs of the villagers can be solved directly by the ** department or through the network platform, and the work of the village cadres is not redundant
2) The reasons why farmers choose to leave their homes to earn a living.
The fundamental reason why peasants left their homes to work in the cities was that they could not reap the economic rewards of their farmland. They want better job opportunities to improve their lives and family situations. However, this situation has also exposed the incompetence of village cadres in rural economic development and raising peasant incomes.
3) Conflict of interest between village cadres.
Some village cadres regard their posts as an opportunity to seek personal gains. They unscrupulously seek personal interests and take advantage of their positions to encroach on collective resources, causing great dissatisfaction among the peasants. Even if village cadres are not removed from their posts, it is necessary to strictly control and regulate their behavior and put an end to the occurrence of corruption.
The peasants' expectation of the abolition of the post of village cadre.
1.Implement grassroots autonomy.
The peasants hope that the principle of grassroots autonomy will be implemented by abolishing village cadres. They hope to return decision-making power to the masses and let the villagers directly participate in the decision-making of village affairs. Only in this way can the wishes of the masses at the grassroots level be fully respected and reflected.
2.Strengthen democracy at the grassroots level.
The removal of village cadres means the elimination of a privileged group. The peasants hope that the abolition of village cadres will promote the development and strengthening of democracy at the grassroots level. They hope to be able to directly elect villagers' representatives and resolve village-level affairs through democratic elections, so as to better protect their rights and interests.
3.Promote rural revitalization.
After the abolition of village cadres, villagers can participate more actively in the process of rural revitalization. They can give full play to their own advantages and specialties to jointly promote village-level economic development and achieve rural prosperity. This is the most important point for farmers.
In fact, there is a certain justification for abolishing the posts of village cadres. From the peasants' point of view, the current village cadres have not brought them much practical benefits, on the contrary, there are still problems such as abuse of power and corruption. Abolishing the posts of village cadres can implement grassroots autonomy, improve grassroots democracy, promote the enthusiasm and initiative of villagers, and promote rural development. However, it cannot be generalized, some village cadres have indeed contributed, and their existence is still valuable. Therefore, while abolishing the posts of village cadres, it is also necessary to clearly define and control them to ensure that the interests of the peasants are reasonably protected. The most important thing is to improve the rural governance system and promote the implementation of the rural revitalization strategy, so that farmers can really benefit from it.
In short, the peasants are talking more and more about the abolition of village cadres, and the main reason is that they believe that the current village cadres do not have much practical role and even have the problems of corruption and abuse of power. However, more study and discussion are needed on whether or not the posts of village cadres should be abolished, so that a more rational and effective solution can be found to ensure that the interests of the peasants are fully protected and to promote the development and progress of the rural areas.