Recently, the United Nations General Assembly held an emergency special session calling on Israel to be thereGaza StripImmediate ceasefire. Although the United States and other countries voted against it, the resolution was eventually passed. Subsequently, the United States ** Biden toPrime Minister of IsraelNetanyahu issued a tough warning. The adoption of this resolution reflects the common aspirations of all countries in the world for an early ceasefire in the Palestinian-Israeli situation, and also highlights the presence of the United StatesIsraeli-Palestinian conflictThe practice of pulling the bias frame and handing the knife has been questioned.
The United Nations convened an emergency special session calling on Israel to cease fire immediately. After its adoption, the draft resolution received a vote in favour from 153 countries, including China, France, Russia and Fiji. Although unlike the Security Council resolution, the resolution adopted this time does notLawsbinding, but still with a degree of political influence. Behind this is the common aspiration of all countries in the world for an early realization of peace in the Palestinian-Israeli situation.
Expansion: The adoption of this resolution has made the desire for peace more clearly expressed in the world. The votes of support from 153 countries sent a positive signal:InternationalThe society is concerned and concerned about the development of the Palestinian-Israeli situation and believes that peace is a solutionIsraeli-Palestinian conflictThe best way. Although the resolution does notLawsbinding, but it amply demonstrates the concerns of the United Nations and effectively promotes the global community's call for peace. At the same time, a few countries such as the United States and Israel voted against this vote, triggeringInternationalSociety's questioning and criticism of its position. This indicatesInternationalSociety pairsIsraeli-Palestinian conflictThe expectation of an early end and the general support for a peaceful settlement.
As a permanent member of the United Nations Security Council, the United States has used its veto power several times on resolutions involving the Israeli-Palestinian ceasefire. Not long ago, the United States vetoed a similar motion in the Security Council, and foreign media reports show that the United States has a different stance on the Palestinian-Israeli issue. In addition,United States**Substantial supplies to Israel were also urgently approvedMilitaryInitiatives for assistance, triggeredInternationalSocietal doubts and controversies.
Expand: The U.S. is supportive at this timeIsraeli-Palestinian conflicthas been questioned. As a permanent member of the United Nations Security Council, the United States has always been seen as a staunch ally in support of Israel. However, the United States is involvedIsraeli-Palestinian conflictThe use of the veto on the resolution, triggeredInternationalSociety's skepticism about its position. On the one hand, the United States vetoed a similar proposal in the Security Council, and on the other hand, approved the supply of large quantities to IsraelMilitaryAid. This contradictory action has bewildered and puzzled many countries. It also exposes the fact that the United States is dealing with itMiddle EastDouble standards and inconsistent positions when it comes to issues. For the support attitude of the United States this time,InternationalThere is a general perception in society that it has not been thereIsraeli-Palestinian conflict, on the contrary, it has further exacerbated tensions.
Despite the fact that the United States has clearly expressed its support for Israel, the day before the adoption of this UN resolution, the United States ** Biden was thereHanukkahA tough speech was made at the event. He toPrime Minister of IsraelNetanyahu issued a warning, indicating Israel'sMilitaryaction may be on itInternationalThe image has a negative impact and gradually loses support. This shows that the United States is aware of Israel'sMilitaryActions may causeInternationalSocial dissatisfaction and criticism can no longer be "covered".
Expand: Biden is inHanukkahThe speeches at the event showed the United States' attitude towards IsraelMilitaryOperational concerns. He emphasized U.S. support for Israel, but also warned about Israel'sMilitaryaction may be on itInternationalThe image has a negative impact and is gradually lostInternationalIn the tank. Biden mentioned that "the global ** could be reversed overnight," clearly expressing concern about Israel's continued indiscriminate bombing. This showsUnited States**The position on Israel has changed to some extent. This is also against Israel inIsraeli-Palestinian conflictcriticism of the excessive use of force, as well as against IsraelMilitaryA warning of the serious consequences that may result from an action. Biden's speech also reflectedInternationalSociety pairsIsraeli-Palestinian conflictcalled for a peaceful negotiated settlement of the dispute and avoided further escalation of the conflict. Minister of Foreign Affairs of the People's Republic of ChinaWang YiThere was a phone call with the Iranian Foreign Minister and expressed his yesIsraeli-Palestinian conflictcalled for an immediate ceasefire, ensuring humanitarian assistance and restoring the "two-state solution". The Chinese side condemned the US position on the Palestinian-Israeli situation.
International**In the reportIsraeli-Palestinian conflictpresented a plurality of perspectives and analyses. On the one hand, some ** highlighted IsraelMilitaryactionSelf-defensenature, considered to be a threat to security. On the other hand, some **focus on the problem of civilians in conflict** and call for a peaceful negotiated settlement of disputes to avoid a humanitarian catastrophe on a larger scale. This diversity of perspectives is further reflectedMiddle EastThe complexity of regional issues.
Expansion: AgainstIsraeli-Palestinian conflictInternational**Presented with a diversity of perspectives and analysis. Some ** emphasize Israel'sSelf-defenseaction, believing that Israel has the right to take it in the face of security threatsMilitaryLet's go. They noted that Israel has been attacked by Islamist terrorist groups and praised the effectiveness of the Israeli army's strikes. On the other hand, some focus on civilians in conflict and humanitarian crises. They criticize Israel'sMilitaryThe excessive use of force has caused enormous harm to Palestinian civilians. They called for a peaceful settlement of the Israeli-Palestinian dispute and the averting of a humanitarian catastrophe on a larger scale. This diversity of perspectives reflects:Middle EastThe complexity and contentiousness of regional issues. At the same time, the ** reports of many countries have also shown that they are rightThe situation in the Middle Eastcalled on all parties to exercise restraint, achieve a ceasefire as soon as possible, and resolve it through dialogueIsraeli-Palestinian conflict。This indicatesInternationalSociety pairsMiddle EastwithIsraeli-Palestinian conflictWe are highly concerned about the issue and hope to resolve disputes through peaceful means and maintain regional stability and security.