In Shanghai, a woman has a deposit of 2 million yuan and a pension of more than 4,000 yuan, but her son who asks for a salary of 4,000 yuan pays 3,000 yuan in alimony every month. After the son paid 108,000 in a lump sum, he never paid a penny again. In a fit of rage, the woman took her son to court, asking for a visit once a week, two calls, and no less than 1 hour each. My son said angrily, I don't want to be controlled anymore.
In this family dispute, the friction and contradictions between the son and the mother escalated, resulting in mutual incomprehension and difficulty in accepting each other's demands. Both parties have their own perspectives and needs, so it becomes very important to find a solution to the problem.
First of all, for economic problems, the son paid a one-time alimony of 108,000 yuan, which is a large contribution. However, the woman believes that this is not enough and hopes to get 3,000 yuan a month in alimony, probably because she has certain expectations and dependence on her son. The son should do his best to help within his financial means, but for the high alimony demand, both parties should find a reasonable solution through dialogue and compromise. The son can offer to pay a lower monthly amount to ensure that his financial needs are met at the same time.
Secondly, for the woman's request to visit once a week, make two calls**, and each call cannot be less than 1 hour, the son felt that he had lost his freedom and control. Everyone has their own time and life plan, and being required to have frequent communication and visits can limit an individual's development and quality of life. However, as a son, he also has the responsibility to care for his mother's life and health, so on the premise of satisfying his son's freedom as much as possible, he can propose to make a more flexible communication and visitation plan with his mother, try to arrange time more reasonably, and take care of each other's needs.
In addition, both parties need to be aware that the law does not resolve emotional disputes. Although the mother took her son to court, the law can only provide a framework to regulate and protect the rights and interests of both parties, and the final solution depends on negotiation and compromise between the two parties. In addition to the legal process, communication and mutual understanding in the family are key to rebuilding family ties and repairing relationships.
Finally, in order to resolve this family issue, the intervention of a third party may be required. A family counsellor or counsellor can provide professional help to guide both parties through effective communication and compromise to find a neutral solution. They can help both parties understand each other's needs and perspectives and provide practical advice to improve family relationships.
In conclusion, in this family dispute, both parties need to understand each other, tolerate each other, and resolve the issue through dialogue and compromise. Economic and emotional issues are interrelated, and both parties should do their best to meet each other's needs within their financial means, and find reasonable means of communication and visitation while guaranteeing personal freedom. The ultimate goal is to rebuild family ties and family harmony, and this goal is achieved by working together.