A few days ago, when I saw a news, I thought it was quite unbelievable, Shanxi spent 8.59 million yuan to purchase a monitoring system to prevent poverty return.
To be honest, just looking at the name makes you think what is this?
Spend 8.59 million to prevent poverty return
What's the use of that?I'm going to be poor, can you detect that I don't have any money in my pocket?Can you send me money?
I have no money in my pocket, so I might as well give the 8.59 million yuan to the poor households, and if I divide 10,000 yuan into one household, I can also help 859 households, which is a huge amount of money for those who have a monthly income of less than 1,000 yuan, and it can really help them.
And now to build a monitoring system to prevent the return to poverty, this focus is a monitoring system, can not really prevent the return to poverty, can only be monitored, what about monitoring?Big-eyed staring?
So just looking at the name feels quite absurd, and the more important thing is the official response: legal compliance.
Yes, if you go through all the procedures, you will be legally compliant, but is it reasonable to be legal and compliant?
Previously, Lushan County, Henan Province spent more than 7 million yuan to build a particularly ugly statue of the Cowherd and Weaver Girl, and at that time it was also said that the procedures were all gone, and the project was legal and compliant, but later the investigation found that there was indeed a problem.
racked their brains to find ways to use various ways to use the state's money to seek rent through one project after another.
It's even getting weirder and weirder.
I would like to ask, wouldn't the people who reviewed this project feel a little embarrassed?
Everyone found that there was no app for various ** projects in the past, which cost a lot of money, but it was not as good as the app made by those private companies.
spent a lot of money, subcontracted layer by layer, and finally made it like a piece of garbage, and everyone knows the reason behind this.
Isn't there a joke?Said that the national budget is 10 million, to build a **, the minister to the deputy minister 5 million to build**, the deputy minister to the secretary 1 million to build**, the secretary to the outsourcing company 500,000 build**, the outsourcing company to subcontract a technology company 100,000 build**, the technology company to the school leader 50,000 build**, the school leader to the director 10,000 build**, the director to the computer teacher 5,000 build**, the teacher to the students homework build**. So, the magical ticket purchase ** was grandly born!
So I don't know what the effect of this poverty monitoring system will be in the end. I guess that's worrying.
Isn't it said that many places are financially strapped now?In some places, wages can't be paid, so how can there be money to engage in these boring projects?It's really a bit blatant to do this in this situation.
End of full text - 2023 annual inventory