The military general single handedly decrypts the truth of the ancient battlefield, why is the 300 r

Mondo Culture Updated on 2024-01-19

On the ancient battlefield, the scene of the military generals going head-to-head was not as frequent as in the romance. From the point of view of physics, the legendary 300-round battle is unscientific. This article will reveal the truth about the heads-up of military generals in ancient warfare through the perspectives of history, the art of war, and tactics.

On the ancient battlefield, the speed of cavalry charges was overwhelming. War is not a matter of tricks, but of quick and effective tactics to deal with the enemy. Compared to the long 300 rounds, a few rounds in a short period of time is already unscientific. "Qi Jiguang's Art of War" emphasizes that real martial arts should focus on actual combat skills, rather than virtual spears and other methods.

round"The term derives from the Spring and Autumn period "Zhishi", which describes the scene of two chariots hedging at high speed. However, wars were not always brutal, and the Spring and Autumn period was more like a high-level social interaction between noble gentlemen. The two sides can also ease tensions during the fighting, giving gifts to each other and chanting poetry.

With the change of times, the war gradually became more brutal, and the "Zhishi" disappeared. Qi Jiguang proposed that when confronting a big enemy, the tactics are different from those for dealing with petty thieves. The army must be strictly disciplined, and thousands of people march in formation, and the brave will not go first, and the cowardly will not lag behind. In high-speed impact, real combat skills are far more simple than complicated tricks.

True heads-up in history is rare, and more often than not, it is a fortuitous event. Even if Guan Yu killed Yan Liang in a formation, the process was very simple, just a matter of one shot. Lu Bu singled out Guo Yan, and in the end Chang'an was lost. It can be seen that heads-up cannot change the entire battle situation.

In ancient warfare, the correct way for a general to command his troops was to use strategy to command his troops, rather than rashly going into battle himself. Xiahou Yuan's act of repairing the antlers was seen as risky, which ultimately led to failure. In ancient warfare, the commander-in-chief usually hid in the rear of the Chinese army and commanded the battle situation by means of commanding flags, horns, and propaganda, while the guards were responsible for protecting the safety of the commander-in-chief.

In the structure of the army, the survival rate of generals and generals is usually higher than that of ordinary soldiers. An army of 10,000 men was divided into the Xing Army, the Heel Army, the flanks and the main force, in which the main generals and generals hid behind the main force. In order to defeat the opponent, it is necessary not only to defeat the three-way army, but also to overcome the resistance of the guards.

On ancient battlefields, generals should follow a cautious strategy rather than act rashly. By revealing the truth of the ancient battlefield, this article deciphers the fantasy of military generals going head-to-head, and emphasizes the practicality and strategy behind the war. In a complex and ever-changing war situation, prudent command is the key to victory.

The article "Commanders Heads-up: Deciphering the Truth of the Ancient Battlefield" profoundly reveals the actual situation of the commanders in ancient wars, and presents readers with a real and interesting picture of the ancient battlefield through the analysis of history, the art of war and tactics.

First of all, this paper deconstructs the scene of "two people running side by side and fighting 300 rounds" that often appears in traditional literature from the perspective of physics. This fantasy spectacle does not conform to the laws of physics in actual warfare, but relies more on actual tactics and skills. This point of view has triggered a deep reflection on the actual combat skills of military generals in ancient wars, and has broken the imagination of some battle scenes.

Secondly, the article gives a vivid description of the actual situation of the ancient battlefield. The importance of discipline and actual combat skills in war is emphasized, in stark contrast to the variety of moves in **. This realistic view gives the reader a better understanding of the nature of ancient warfare and reveals the true laws of survival in war.

The article also deepens readers' understanding of ancient warfare through historical allusions, such as "Zhishi" and war examples during the Three Kingdoms period. From the high-level social interaction of the Spring and Autumn Period to the cruel reality of the Warring States Period, the changes of history show the diversity of forms of warfare. This historical contrast gives the reader a fuller appreciation of the complexity and variability of ancient warfare.

In addition, the article provides an in-depth analysis of the role of generals in ancient warfare. Emphasis was placed on the fact that generals should command their troops skillfully rather than rashly enter the battle, and that the safety of the commanders and generals should be protected by the Guards. This deep insight provides readers with a new understanding of ancient military leadership, breaking with some conventional notions.

Overall, this article presents readers with a realistic and three-dimensional picture of the ancient battlefield through an in-depth interpretation of the multiple dimensions of ancient warfare. Through the contrast between fantasy and reality, the reader is provided with a new understanding of the nature of ancient warfare. This rational and interesting way of reading gives readers a deeper understanding of ancient warfare.

Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.

If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!

Related Pages