In 1988, the Chinese People's Liberation Army implemented a new military rank system, which made major changes to the military system and the experience of senior generals. The new military rank system is more simplified and the specifications are relatively lowered, and the titles of generalissimo, marshal, general, and captain are no longer established, and the highest rank is the first class general, and the generals are divided into four levels: first class general, first general, lieutenant general, and major general. So, who will receive the rank of lieutenant general?
According to the Regulations on the Ranks of Officers of the Chinese People's Liberation Army promulgated on July 1, 1988, the rank of lieutenant general mainly includes members of the Central Military Commission, chief of the General Staff, directors of the General Political Department, principal posts and deputy posts of the Grand Military Region, as well as regular military posts and senior professional and technical posts. Specifically, the corresponding job ranks of the rank of lieutenant general are general-lieutenant general, member of the ** Military Commission with the benchmark rank of general, chief of the General Staff, and director of the General Political Department;General - Lieutenant General, the main position of the military region with the standard rank of general;Lieutenant General - Colonel, the base rank is the deputy of the Grand Military Region of Lieutenant General;Lieutenant General - Colonel, the base military rank is a regular military rank of Major General;and Lieutenant General – Major, a senior professional and technical position with the base rank of Major General.
According to the criteria for awarding the rank of officers on active duty, regular military positions (including deputy corps ranks) can be rated as lieutenant general, major general, and colonel. The performance of political integrity and ability is good, and the deputy corps post who enlisted in the army before the Anti-Japanese War period (inclusive);Those who enlisted in the army during the War of Liberation and held a higher position in history, or who held a position at or above the regular army level for a longer period of time, can generally be rated as a lieutenant general. The technical level can be rated as lieutenant general, major general, and colonel. Those who perform well in political integrity and ability can generally be rated as major generals;Those who enlisted in the army during the War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression (inclusive), have a long technical level and have made special contributions, can be rated as lieutenant generals. On the whole, the evaluation of lieutenant generals is mainly affected by various conditions such as position, seniority, and performance.
Prior to the implementation of the new military rank system, on July 2, 1988, the Military Commission issued the "Instructions on the Assessment of the Work of Conferring Military Ranks to Officers on Active Duty", which clarified the scope, basic principles, methods and steps, time arrangements and evaluation criteria for the evaluation of military ranks. The evaluation of the military rank of officers at or above the deputy rank in a large military region is in the hands of the ** Military Commission, while the evaluation of the military rank of officers below the rank of full military officer is in the hands of the party committee at the next higher level of the officer's unit. The evaluation criteria are based on comprehensive factors such as officers' moral integrity and integrity, historical background, and experience in the Anti-Japanese War to ensure that the evaluation is fair and reasonable.
In 1988, there was some controversy over the actual number of people conferred the rank of lieutenant general, with different accounts differing, mainly 145, 146, 147 and 133. According to the accurate information available to the author, at the end of 1988, there were 146 lieutenant generals in the army. Among them, on September 16, 1988, the ** Military Commission awarded Ding Heng and other 96 people the rank of lieutenant general, Ma Xinchun and other 19 people the rank of vice admiral, and Yu Zhenwu and 31 others the rank of lieutenant general of the Air Force.
The attainment of the rank of lieutenant general is not only determined by the officer's position and technical rank, but also by the individual's struggle and outstanding achievements. Looking back at the list of officers who were awarded the rank of lieutenant general in 1988, they have made outstanding achievements in different fields and made outstanding contributions to the modernization of our army and the cause of national defense.
Lieutenant General Han Huaizhi, deputy chief of the General Staff, provided a solid organizational guarantee for the implementation of our army's rank system. Lieutenant General Jia Chaoqun, who served as head of the Third Department of the General Staff, gave full play to his talent in military guidance. Lieutenant General Yang Dezhong, who concurrently serves as the first deputy director of the General Office of the Communist Party of China and director of the Security Bureau, has provided important support for the close ties between the army and the party.
In addition, a large number of outstanding lieutenant generals and officers have emerged in the leadership of the major military districts of the army. Lieutenant General Liu Cunzhi, commander of the Shenyang Military Region, Lieutenant General Song Keda, political commissar, and Lieutenant General Zhu Dunfa, deputy commander of the Shenyang Military Region, have rich military experience in the northeast region and have made important contributions to our army's defense construction. Lieutenant General Zhou Yibing, commander of the Beijing Military Region, and Lieutenant General Li Laizhu, deputy commander of the Beijing Military Region, have played a key role in maintaining military stability in the capital region.
Female generals in the army are also one of the highlights, and Vice Admiral Zhang Xusan has performed well in the post of deputy commander and chief of staff of the navy. Her leadership style and decision-making skills have breathed new life into the Navy.
Overall, the group of officers who attained the rank of lieutenant general in 1988 is large and outstanding, and they have demonstrated outstanding talent and dedication in different fields. The emergence of this group of officers marks the readjustment and optimization of our army's rank system, and also lays a solid foundation for the modernization of the army and the vigorous development of the national defense cause.
This paper deeply analyzes the background and implementation rules of the adjustment of the military rank system in our army in 1988, as well as the conditions and standards for obtaining the rank of lieutenant general. Through a detailed introduction of the number of people who have obtained the rank of lieutenant general and the list of lists, the glorious achievements of a number of outstanding generals in the army at that time have been displayed, and they have made remarkable contributions to the modernization of our army and the cause of national defense.
First of all, the article gives a detailed account of the reform of the military rank system in our army in 1988, highlighting the differences from the period of the first military rank system from 1955 to 1965. This change not only involves the adjustment of the national defense leadership system and the military structure, but also affects the promotion conditions and hierarchical settings of senior generals. Through this foreshadowing, readers can clearly understand the importance of the new military rank system and the historical background behind it.
Secondly, this paper makes an in-depth analysis of the conditions for obtaining the rank of lieutenant general, covering many aspects such as position, seniority, and performance. This comprehensive evaluation mechanism makes the awarding of the rank of lieutenant general more scientific and reasonable. At the same time, the article also reveals that in the process of evaluating and conferring the rank of lieutenant general, the party committee and the military commission respectively have the right to evaluate, ensuring the fairness and transparency of the evaluation.
In addition, the article vividly shows the outstanding deeds of a group of officers at that time through the specific number and list of lieutenant generals. These lieutenant generals and officers have demonstrated outstanding leadership and outstanding performance in various military districts and military positions. This provides the reader with a more intuitive and specific understanding, which makes the whole article more lively and interesting.
Finally, in a summary way, the article emphasizes the great contribution made by the appearance of this group of lieutenant generals to the development of our army. This point makes a clear and positive conclusion for the article, which makes the whole review have a clear orientation and appeal. At the end of the article, it is also mentioned that the achievements of this group of officers have laid a solid foundation for the rank system of our army, injected new vitality into the cause of national defense, and left a deep impression on readers.
In general, this review provides a profound and comprehensive analysis of the article, through a detailed interpretation of the adjustment of the rank system of our army in 1988, as well as an analysis of the conditions for obtaining the rank of lieutenant general and the list of personnel, presenting a clear and vivid picture for readers.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!