Title:
The climate talks are shocking!Oil supremacy vs.Earth Savior, guess who wins?
The climate summit is coming to an end, but tensions are far from gone. Oil majors and climate protectors have taken-for-tat posture at the late-night table. The question is: why is there such an impasse?How should we respond to this critical moment?
Today, UN Secretary-General António Guterres traveled to Dubai to end his call for an end to fossil fuels. But why is it that in this race for the future of humanity, oil-producing countries have refused to accept historic calls to phase out fossil fuels?
Behind this refusal is the intransigence of oil giants such as Saudi Arabia. In this crisis, faced with multiple threats such as global warming and rising sea levels, they insist on defending their oil economic interests. What are the reasons for such insistence?
In the face of calls from the Low Islands, the climate summit hosted by a major oil-backed city is the first to consider calling for a withdrawal from oil, gas and coal. However, oil exporters such as Saudi Arabia have been at the forefront of opposition, and the OPEC cartel has urged members to vote against phasing out fossil fuels. What are the reasons for this?
Simon Steele, the head of the UN climate agency, called on the parties at this moment to remove the "unnecessary tactical blockade" that has prevented an agreement, but he did not point the finger by name. Are these so-called tactical blockades a cover-up of a deeper conspiracy?
Guterres stressed that the key to solving the climate crisis lies in the production and consumption of fossil fuels. He said the call to action "does not mean that all countries must phase out fossil fuels at the same time". Could such a flexible stance provide room for compromise on the part of States?
As for the focus of disagreement at the summit, it focused on two issues: fossil fuels and climate finance in developed countries. Can we find consensus on the differences between these two major issues at this critical moment?
In this negotiation, the draft agreement proposed by China and the United States has become a beautiful landscape. It includes four pathways away from fossil fuels, but it also leaves a fifth option: keeping the issue out of the final agreement. In the final draft of the U.S.-China agreement, the deployment of renewable energy was key, but was it just a flashy show?
The United States, the world's largest oil producer, celebrated the 80th birthday of climate envoy John Kerry during the climate talks in Dubai. Does his support for phasing out represent a genuine determination on the part of the United States, or is it just a show of hypocrisy?
At this critical juncture, we see Saudi Arabia and other oil powers struggling with phasing out fossil fuels in order to preserve their economies and positions. Will such ambivalence ultimately pose a greater threat to the planet?
Summit Chairman Sultan Jaber called on countries to end on time on Tuesday, but is it just a bluff call?Can he truly be impartial between the interests of the oil powers and the needs of the global climate?
While the draft agreement on U.S.-China cooperation calls for an increase in renewable energy, will it be enough to tackle the global climate crisis?Is it a real action, or is it just a paper agreement?
How do we respond to this pressing question in this contest for the future of the world?Perhaps, this is not just a climate summit, but also a decisive battle to reveal human choices and future destiny.
At the last minute, we saw that the draft agreement proposed by the US and China seemed to provide a glimmer of hope for the global climate problem. However, whether this is just a glamorous show will take time to verify. Does the insistence of countries such as Saudi Arabia on fossil fuels mean that global climate action will falter?
Are there more complex political and economic considerations behind the oil majors' rejection?Tactical blockade and interest game, has all this intensified at the negotiating table of the summit?
At a historic moment, we have seen the divide between the developed countries and the developing countries that have been most affected by the disaster. The issue of climate finance has become an obstacle to global cooperation. How can we balance the needs of all parties and achieve true global cooperation?
Looking back at the whole article, we can see from the beginning of the summit the rejection of the oil giants, the voice of the earth, behind the negotiations, and the dawn of Sino-US cooperation. Every detail makes up a huge puzzle, and the key to this puzzle is the solution of the climate crisis.
In this challenging and divisive time, we have to face the question head-on: Can the oil majors put aside their short-sighted economic interests and work together to achieve climate goals?Can the international community form a real synergy to address the threat of global climate change?
The end of the climate summit may not be the end, but a new beginning. We may need more time to witness real change, but that doesn't mean we can wait. In this global battle against the climate crisis, each of us is a participant and has a responsibility to bear.
So, what do we do?This is not only a question for national leaders at the summit, but also a question in everyone's heart. We need to ask ourselves whether our lifestyles and consumption Xi contribute to climate protectionAre we willing to work together to achieve global climate goals for the sake of future generations?
This is not just a climate summit, but also a torture of future choices. We can't avoid it, and we can't stay out of it. Only by working together can we meet the challenges brought about by global climate change and write a new chapter for the future of the earth and the future of mankind.