In 1959, the People's Republic of China celebrated its 10th anniversary, but on the eve of the National Day, the Chinese History Museum reported a theft case that shocked the whole country: the theft of the Western Zhou Dynasty bronze "Shi Konghe". The case involved politics, history, and artifacts, and became one of the most influential museum thefts since the founding of the Republic.
The Chinese History Museum was established in August 1959 to celebrate its 10th anniversary. In this process, the Prime Minister personally participated in the collection of cultural relics and appealed to large collectors to donate generously, adding many rare treasures to the museum. For the importance of the exhibits, ** did not dare to ignore it, personally approved the arrangement of cultural relics in the exhibition hall, and finally reported to *** for approval.
The museum was officially opened to the public on July 1, 1961, but on August 18, a conservator of the History Museum found that the priceless "Shi Konghe" was missing in the No. 32 display case of the Western Zhou Dynasty Social Cultural Relics Exhibition Hall. This bronze artifact more than 3,000 years ago is known as a treasure in the field of archaeology and history to study the history of Chinese metrology and agriculture, and it is also a national first-class cultural relic, which can be called a national treasure.
As soon as the theft case was reported, it immediately attracted great attention from ***. After learning of this, the prime minister quickly made two decisions: one is to strictly prevent information leakage;The second is to solve the case within a time limit. Considering the special moment of the celebration of the tenth anniversary of the republic, the Prime Minister even wondered whether the case was related to enemy agents or whether there was a bigger secret involved.
The Museum Security Section worked closely with the Beijing Municipal Public Security Bureau to launch an investigation. During the on-site investigation, they found that the security measures inside the new building were extremely tight, making it difficult for outsiders to enter, so it was likely that it was done by insiders. After layers of escalation, the possibility of the insider committing the crime was finally determined.
After listening to the report, An Lin, deputy director of the Beijing Municipal Public Security Bureau, discussed with other relevant personnel and unanimously determined that the insider had committed the crime. Han Bingwen, director of the museum's administrative department, and Li Baoting, director of the investigation department of the Beijing Municipal Public Security Bureau, became the leaders of the case. They conducted an in-depth analysis of the staff inside the museum and finally identified the three suspects as conservators Ding Dahua, Zhao Tongzhen and Yang Wenhe.
All three have vehemently denied any involvement in the theft. Zhao Tongzhen's personal information made the investigation team suspicious, he used to serve in the army, and later transferred to the museum, he has a negative attitude towards work, he likes to take advantage of small advantages, and even has petty theft.
Although the investigation team issued a co-investigation warrant to all provinces and cities across the country and classified the case as top secret, eight months have passed and the investigation team has made no progress. Faced with this situation, Han Bingwen and Li Baoting decided to adopt a new way and organize a working group to go to the countryside to carry out work, and three custodians were also arranged among them. In the rural village of Niulanshan in Shunyi County, their lives are not satisfactory, and they are often bullied by nearby villagers, and their belongings are often stolen.
In the working group, there is a man named Wang Shuli who is in charge of observing the suspect. On February 13, 1961, when everyone was about to go back to the city for the Chinese New Year, someone found that Zhao Tongzhen was trying to hide the stolen goods. After a fierce scuffle, it is revealed that he is the thief. It turned out that Zhao Tongzhen hid the stolen "Shi Konghe" in his big cup.
Zhao Tongzhen's arrest has brought the case to an end, but the inside story behind the case is still mysterious. Zhao Tongzhen confessed that his original intention of stealing "Shi Konghe" was to make the team leader Zhang Rong take the blame and resign, because Zhang Rong often sneered at him, and the relationship between the two was tense.
The detection of this case not only reveals the inside story behind the theft, but also makes people think deeply about the importance of the safety of cultural relics. The national treasure "Shi Konghe" eventually returned to the museum, but this thrilling past has made people have a deeper understanding of the protection of historical relics. The resolution of the theft case is also the icing on the cake for the Republic on the occasion of the 10th anniversary of the founding of the People's Republic of China.
This article details a theft at the Chinese Museum of History in 1959, involving a national treasure called the Western Zhou Dynasty bronze "Shi Konghe". By recreating the historical background, political atmosphere, and investigation process, the article vividly shows the tension at that time and the twists and turns of the investigation work. The article uses a narrative approach to give readers an in-depth understanding of the ins and outs of this case, and at the same time provokes deep thinking about the protection of cultural relics.
First of all, when depicting the background of the establishment of the Chinese History Museum, the article shows an attitude towards the cherishing of national treasures by mentioning the personal participation of the prime minister and the plot of appealing to the generous donations of large collectors. This practice of calling for donations of cultural relics reflects the great importance that China attaches to the protection of cultural relics at that time, and also provides rich treasures for the construction of museums.
Second, the outbreak of thefts makes people think about the security issues inside the museum. The article points out that the museum's internal security precautions are tight, and it is difficult for outsiders to enter, so it is more likely that it was done by insiders. This reveals an important issue that the security of cultural relics is not only related to external threats, but also that internal management needs to be strengthened to avoid similar incidents.
In the course of the investigation, the prime minister's great attention to the theft case is reflected in two decisions: one is to prevent leakageThe second is to solve the case within a time limit. This shows the resolute determination to maintain social security and the value of cultural relics. In the face of the tense moment of the 10th anniversary celebrations of the Republic, the Prime Minister reacted more cautiously and thoughtfully, thinking deeply about the larger secrets that might be involved in the case.
The most fascinating part is the process of solving the theft. In the way that Han Bingwen and Li Baoting organized an investigation in the countryside, the article integrated the criminal suspects into rural life through the arrangement of the working group, which increased the difficulty of solving the case, and also presented a surprising means to win. This strategy of catching turtles in an urn provides strong support for the successful detection of the case.
Finally, the article reveals the motive behind the theft, and the reason why Zhao Tongzhen stole "Shi Konghe" and hid it in the Dayu Ding was because of his conflict with the team leader Zhang Rong. This glimpses deeper into the theft, not just the greed for artifacts, but also the complex interweaving of human relationships. Such revelations make the whole case more dramatic and make people think more deeply about the complexity of human nature.
Overall, this article brings readers into the scene of the theft of the Chinese History Museum through vivid narration and detailed descriptions. While reflecting historical events, the article also provokes deep reflections on the protection of cultural relics, the safety management of museums, and the complexity of human nature, providing readers with an opportunity to gain an in-depth understanding of history and society.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!