The fuss was big, and the giant toy dog occupied three parking spaces, causing the neighbors to be a

Mondo Social Updated on 2024-01-30

It's really a big forest, and there are all kinds of birds. It's a big deal, it's incredible to have such a neighbor, and this practice is legal but unreasonable!

Recently, a property owner in a community bought three parking spaces in one go, and in order to prevent others from parking, he actually bought a toy dog to occupy the parking space, and fenced off the three parking spaces.

The landlord's approach caused dissatisfaction among the neighbors, who said that the parking space in the community was already tight, and he didn't stop it, and even used a toy to occupy three parking spaces.

So I complained to the property, but the property said that the three parking spaces were bought by others, and it was people's freedom to put anything on them.

No one else has a parking space, you don't need to use the parking space yourself and don't let others use it, get such a big toy dog, and then occupy the parking space, it's really infuriating.

But as the property company said, the parking space was bought by him, and he loves to use it and how to use it. Outsiders really don't have a good way.

As netizens said, it's hard to buy a house and live without people. You still have to live in other people's houses, and that's true.

It's still a bit wrong for you to buy a parking space that you don't put in the car, even if it's empty, or it's locked on the ground. For example, if you have a kitchen in one row, you have to put the toilet, and you say that you want to use the place you bought.

Parking spaces, no problem with putting the car, no problem with empty and not for others to use, but it is not appropriate to put other things, such as I put a bunch of paper shells, which definitely does not meet the fire protection requirements.

Legally, that's fine. But there is still a big problem in terms of personal morality, and you can rent it out if you don't need it.

Don't say that you are not bad for money, you don't want to rent or anything, please note that this is not a question of money or not, but a question of how to use social resources efficiently, which is now equal to idle resources.

Then the parking space resources in the community itself are tight, there is a saying that the money is yours, but the resources are the whole society, just like if you go to a restaurant to eat, you order two tables to eat and throw one table, that is also not okay.

In the same way, you buy a parking space, but that doesn't mean you can waste it, especially if parking is tight. This kind of waste is very glaring, and if it is not bad for money, you can let your neighbors use it for free.

Now the proportion of parking spaces in the newly built community is relatively high, but despite this, it still cannot meet the needs of vehicle growth.

After all, parking spaces have strong public attributes, so the parking spaces in the community can not be restricted, according to the number of houses to limit the number of parking spaces to buy, and the person who buys must be the owner, and then the number of owners to buy, several suites and several parking spaces.

Developers can't just sell or rent parking spaces, let alone sell them all at once. Regardless of the future parking demand, the rent is not speculated, in fact, the parking space should be parked and not speculated.

From this point of view, this is legal, but the annoying thing should be the parking space ** method, and this kind of absurdity should not be staged.

People buy it, what is a social resource This is a moral kidnapping, why don't you buy a parking space when you buy a house, and you can play this set when the three of them are useless.

What is there to be dissatisfied with the parking spaces that people bought?If there is a shortage of parking spaces in the community, can you go and occupy other people's parking spaces?Where is the confidence to be dissatisfied.

I'm surprised, people bought their own parking spaces. Occupy it yourself, and you can't still have a good character?According to this logic, who doesn't have something to sit idle?Everyone in the world is not good at character.

Housing is already tight, so many empty houses, can I go and live?Income is already tight, and other people have so much money in the bank, can I take it out and use it?

These angry people want to take advantage of it and can't take advantage of it, it is estimated that he is reluctant to buy it when he buys it, thinking that he can park for free if he can't sell it anyway, but now that he has been bought by others, he has no place to park, so he is angry.

In any case, although you paid for it, it is indeed a bit undeserved to waste resources in the end.

What do you think about this?

Related Pages